Comparison of organ donation and transplantation rates between opt-out and opt-in systems

被引:143
作者
Arshad, Adam [1 ]
Anderson, Benjamin [2 ]
Sharif, Adnan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[2] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Dept Nephrol & Transplantat, Birmingham B15 2WB, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Birmingham, Inst Immunol & Immunotherapy, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
deceased donation; living donation; transplantation; opt-out; organ donation; presumed consent; PRESUMED CONSENT LEGISLATION; SPAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.kint.2019.01.036
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Studies comparing opt-out and opt-in approaches to organ donation have generally suggested higher donation and transplantation rates in countries with an opt-out strategy. We compared organ donation and transplantation rates between countries with opt-out versus opt-in systems to investigate possible differences in the contemporary era. Data were analysed for 35 countries registered with the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (17 countries classified as opt-out, 18 classified as opt-in) and obtained organ donation and transplantation rates for 2016 from the Global Observatory for Donation and Transplantation. Compared to opt-in countries, opt-out countries had fewer living donors per million population (4.8 versus 15.7, respectively) with no significant difference in deceased donors (20.3 versus 15.4, respectively). Overall, no significant difference was observed in rates of kidney (35.2 versus 42.3 respectively), non-renal (28.7 versus 20.9, respectively), or total solid organ transplantation (63.6 versus 61.7, respectively). In a multivariate linear regression model, an opt-out system was independently predictive of fewer living donors but was not associated with the number of deceased donors or with transplantation rates. Apart from the observed difference in the rates of living donation, our data demonstrate no significant difference in deceased donation or solid organ transplantation activity between opt-out versus opt-in countries. This suggests that other barriers to organ donation must be addressed, even in settings where consent for donation is presumed.
引用
收藏
页码:1453 / 1460
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   The impact of presumed consent legislation on cadaveric organ donation: A cross-country study [J].
Abadie, Alberto ;
Gay, Sebastien .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2006, 25 (04) :599-620
[2]   Deemed consent: assessing the new opt-out approach to organ procurement in Wales [J].
Albertsen, Andreas .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2018, 44 (05) :314-318
[3]   Organ donation in Sweden [J].
Bäckman, L ;
Croon, AC ;
Feuk, U ;
Persson, NH .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 34 (07) :2560-2560
[4]   Opting-out systems: no guarantee for higher donation rates [J].
Coppen, R ;
Friele, RD ;
Marquet, RL ;
Gevers, SKM .
TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 18 (11) :1275-1279
[5]   Brazil abolishes "presumed consent" in organ donation [J].
Csillag, C .
LANCET, 1998, 352 (9137) :1367-1367
[6]   The meaning of default options for potential organ donors [J].
Davidai, Shai ;
Gilovich, Thomas ;
Ross, Lee D. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2012, 109 (38) :15201-15205
[7]   Presumed Consent Legislation Failed to Improve Organ Donation in Chile [J].
Dominguez, J. ;
Rojas, J. L. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2013, 45 (04) :1316-1317
[8]  
English V, 2007, BRIT MED J, V334, P1088, DOI 10.1136/bmj.39199.475301.AD
[9]   Increasing the Use of Kidneys From Unconventional and High-Risk Deceased Donors [J].
Heilman, R. L. ;
Mathur, A. ;
Smith, M. L. ;
Kaplan, B. ;
Reddy, K. S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 16 (11) :3086-3092
[10]   Informing the Debate: Rates of Kidney Transplantation in Nations With Presumed Consent [J].
Horvat, Lucy D. ;
Cuerden, Meaghan S. ;
Kim, S. Joseph ;
Koval, John J. ;
Young, Ann ;
Garg, Amit X. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 153 (10) :641-649