Muslim Religious Openness and Ilm Relationships with Islamic Religious Reflection, Religious Schema, and Religious Commitments in Malaysia

被引:12
作者
Tekke, Mustafa
Watson, P. J. [1 ]
Ismail, Nik A. Hisham
Chen, Zhuo [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Psychol Dept 2803, Chattanooga, TN 37403 USA
[2] Univ Oregon, Dept Psychol, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
来源
ARCHIVE FOR THE PSYCHOLOGY OF RELIGION-ARCHIV FUR RELIGIONSPSYCHOLOGIE | 2015年 / 37卷 / 03期
关键词
religious openness; Islamic Religious Reflection; Religious Schema Scales; Ilm; quest; Malaysia; INTEGRATIVE SELF-KNOWLEDGE; UNITED-STATES; ORIENTATION; QUEST; VARIETIES; VALIDITY; SCALE; IRAN;
D O I
10.1163/15736121-12341313
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Religious Reflection Scales yield cross-cultural data suggesting that religious traditions have potentials to integrate intellect with faith. This investigation extended analysis of that possibility to Sunni Muslim university students in Malaysia (N = 211) and also examined the hypothesis that Islamic commitments to knowledge (Ilm) promote religious openness. Faith and Intellect Oriented Religious Reflection correlated positively and predicted openness. The Truth of Texts and Teachings factor from the Religious Schema Scales essentially assesses a form of fundamentalism and displayed direct linkages with religious openness as well. Ilm factors from the Ummatic Personality Inventory correlated positively with religious openness and mediated associations of Islamic Religious Reflection with other constructs. Quest as a presumed index of religious openness proved to be incompatible with sincere Muslim commitments. These findings supplemented previous Muslim, Christian, and Hindu data in confirming the potential openness of religious traditions.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 320
页数:26
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Appraising the State of Measurement of Islamic Religiousness [J].
Abu-Raiya, Hisham ;
Hill, Peter C. .
PSYCHOLOGY OF RELIGION AND SPIRITUALITY, 2014, 6 (01) :22-32
[2]  
Aiken L. S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions
[3]   PERSONAL RELIGIOUS ORIENTATION AND PREJUDICE [J].
ALLPORT, GW ;
ROSS, JM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1967, 5 (04) :432-&
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, The International Journal for The Psychology of Religion, DOI [DOI 10.1207/S15327582IJPR02025, 10.1207/s15327582ijpr0202_5, DOI 10.1207/S15327582IJPR0202_5]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, MODERN SOCIAL IMAGIN
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2012, PROCESS VERSATILE CO
[7]  
Azram M, 2011, IIUM ENG J, V12, P179
[8]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[9]  
Batson C.D., 1993, RELIG INDIVIDUAL
[10]   MEASURING RELIGION AS QUEST .2. RELIABILITY CONCERNS [J].
BATSON, CD ;
SCHOENRADE, PA .
JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF RELIGION, 1991, 30 (04) :430-447