The Computational Thinking Scale for Computer Literacy Education

被引:69
作者
Tsai, Meng-Jung [1 ]
Liang, Jyh-Chong [1 ]
Hsu, Chung-Yuan [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Normal Univ, Sch Learning Informat, Program Learning Sci, 162,Sec 1 Hoping E Rd, Taipei 106, Taiwan
[2] Natl Pingtung Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Child Care, Pingtung, Taiwan
关键词
computational thinking; computer literacy; digital literacy; evaluation; quantitative; problem solving; programming;
D O I
10.1177/0735633120972356
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Computational thinking has received tremendous attention from computer science educators and educational researchers in the last decade. However, most prior literature defines computational thinking as thinking outcomes rather than thinking processes. Based on Selby and Woodland's framework, this study developed and validated the Computational Thinking Scale (CTS) to assess all students' thought processes of computational thinking for both general and specific problem-solving contexts in five dimensions: abstraction, decomposition, algorithmic thinking, evaluation and generalization. A survey including 25 candidate items for CTS as well as demographic variables was administered to 388 junior high school students in Taiwan. An explorative factor analysis using the principal axis method with the oblimin rotation was used to validate the scale. Finally, 19 items were extracted successfully under the designed five dimensions, with a total explained variance of 64.03% and an overall reliability of 0.91. Results of the demographic comparisons showed that boys had a greater disposition than girls in decomposition thinking when solving problems using computer programming. In addition, programming learning experience, especially self-directed learning and after-school learning, had significant positive effects on all dimensions of CTS. Several future studies are suggested using this tool.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 602
页数:24
相关论文
共 69 条
[61]  
Weinstein C.E., 1998, STUDY STRATEGIES LIF
[62]   Defining Computational Thinking for Mathematics and Science Classrooms [J].
Weintrop, David ;
Beheshti, Elham ;
Horn, Michael ;
Orton, Kai ;
Jona, Kemi ;
Trouille, Laura ;
Wilensky, Uri .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 25 (01) :127-147
[63]  
Wilkinson K., 2006, DELTA PI EPSILON J, V48, P108
[64]  
Wing J., 2011, LINK NEWS SCH COMPUT, V6, P20
[65]   Computational thinking [J].
Wing, JM .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2006, 49 (03) :33-35
[66]   Developing Computational Thinking through a Virtual Robotics Programming Curriculum [J].
Witherspoon, Eben B. ;
Higashi, Ross M. ;
Schunn, Christian D. ;
Baehr, Emily C. ;
Shoop, Robin .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTING EDUCATION, 2017, 18 (01)
[67]   Computational Thinking in Elementary and Secondary Teacher Education [J].
Yadav, Aman ;
Mayfield, Chris ;
Zhou, Ninger ;
Hambrusch, Susanne ;
Korb, John T. .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTING EDUCATION, 2014, 14 (01)
[68]   A valid and reliable tool for examining computational thinking skills [J].
Yagci, Mustafa .
EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, 24 (01) :929-951
[69]  
Yin Y, 2020, J SCI EDUC TECHNOL, V29, P189, DOI 10.1007/s10956-019-09794-8