The Role of External and Internal Team Coaches in Teacher Design Teams. A Mixed Methods Study

被引:7
作者
Compen, Boukje [1 ,2 ]
Schelfhout, Wouter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Antwerp Sch Educ, Fac Social Sci, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Econ & Business, Leuven Econ Educ Res, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
mixed methods; team coach; teacher design team; team learning; teacher professional development; SHARED LEADERSHIP; MANAGEMENT TEAMS; SELF-EFFICACY; COMMUNITIES; CURRICULUM; KNOWLEDGE; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.3390/educsci10100263
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Teacher design teams (TDTs) are increasingly used as a means for teacher professional development. It has been posited that for teacher learning to occur, TDTs need support from team coaches. These coaches are either external experts or peer teachers that guide the team from within. The current literature is in debate on whether external or internal coaches are most effective in supporting TDTs. In this study, we, therefore, examine whether these coach types differ in how they fulfil their role. We additionally evaluate how coaching interacts with the team learning process and the TDT trajectory's outcomes. We used a mixed methods design in the context of a large-scale TDT trajectory in Flanders (Belgium). We administered questionnaires among 63 teachers of 18 TDTs, and conducted interviews with the coaches of 14 TDTs. Our results indicate that coaching activities correlate with the majority of team learning beliefs and behaviours (TLBB) examined, as well as with perceived team effectiveness and the quality of material developed. Whereas teachers in TDTs with an internal coach seem to evaluate the coaching activities and the TLBB more positively than teachers in TDTs with an external coach, the opposite holds for perceptions of the trajectory's outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 23
页数:23
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Adams WC., 2015, Handbook of practical program evaluation, P492, DOI [10.1002/9781119171386.ch19, DOI 10.1002/9781119171386.CH19]
[2]   Organising communities-of-practice: facilitating emergence [J].
Akkerman, Sanne ;
Petter, Christian ;
de laat, Maarten .
JOURNAL OF WORKPLACE LEARNING, 2008, 20 (06) :383-399
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, APPL SOCIAL RES METH
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, THESIS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, THESIS
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, 2 INT HDB ED CHANGE, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-2660-6_13
[7]   Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years [J].
Avalos, Beatrice .
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2011, 27 (01) :10-20
[8]   Updating polytechnic teachers' knowledge and skills through teacher design teams in Ghana [J].
Bakah, Marie A. B. ;
Voogt, Joke M. ;
Pieters, Jules M. .
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN EDUCATION, 2012, 38 (01) :7-24
[9]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[10]   When smart groups fail [J].
Barron, B .
JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 2003, 12 (03) :307-359