Current management of small bowel obstruction in the UK: results from the National Audit of Small Bowel Obstruction clinical practice survey

被引:31
作者
Lee, M. J. [1 ,2 ]
Sayers, A. E. [2 ,3 ]
Wilson, T. R. [3 ]
Acheson, A. G. [4 ]
Anderson, I. D. [5 ]
Fearnhead, N. S. [6 ]
机构
[1] Sheffield Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[2] South Yorkshire Surg Res Grp, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Doncaster & Bassetlaw Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Doncaster, England
[4] Nottingham Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Nottingham, England
[5] Salford Royal NHS Fdn Trust, Salford, Lancs, England
[6] Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Cambridge, England
关键词
Small bowel obstruction; surgery; survey; nutritional support; clinical guideline; SOLUBLE CONTRAST AGENT; EARLY OPERATION; CT FINDINGS; SURGERY; METAANALYSIS; CARE; OUTCOMES; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1111/codi.14016
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. The National Audit of Small Bowel Obstruction (NASBO) is a collaboration between trainees and specialty associations to improve the care of patients with SBO through national clinical audit. The aim of this study was to define current consultant practice preferences in the management of SBO in the UK. Method A survey was designed to assess practice preferences of consultant surgeons. The anonymous survey captured demographics, indications for surgery or conservative management, use of investigations including water-soluble contrast agents (WSCA), use of laparoscopy and nutritional support strategies. The questionnaire underwent two pilot rounds prior to dissemination via the NASBO network. Results A total of 384 responses were received from 131 NASBO participating units (overall response rate 29.2%). Abdominal CT and serum urea and electrolytes were considered essential initial investigations by more than 80% of consultants. Consensus was demonstrated on indications for early surgery and conservative management. Three hundred and thirty-eight (88%) respondents would consider use of WSCA; of these, 328 (97.1%) would use it in adhesive SBO. Two hundred (52.1%) consultants considered a laparoscopic approach when operating for SBO. Oral nutritional supplements were favoured in operatively managed patients by 259 (67.4%) respondents compared with conservatively managed patients (186 respondents, 48.4%). Conclusion This survey demonstrates consensus on imaging requirements and indications for early surgery in the management of SBO. Significant variation exists around awareness of the need for nutritional support in patients with SBO, and on strategies to achieve this support.
引用
收藏
页码:623 / 630
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Abbas SM, 2007, BRIT J SURG, V94, P404, DOI 10.1002/bjs.5775
  • [2] Abercrombie J, 2017, GIRFT NATL SPECIALTY
  • [3] [Anonymous], N ENGL J MED
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2016, 2 PAT REP NAT EM LAP
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2011, ION RAD DOS COMP
  • [6] Using Care Bundles to Improve Surgical Outcomes and Reduce Variation in Care for Fragility Hip Fracture Patients
    Bandara, Stephanie
    Lynch, Genni
    Cooke, Cameron
    Varghese, Paul
    Ward, Nicola
    [J]. GERIATRIC ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY & REHABILITATION, 2017, 8 (02) : 104 - 108
  • [7] Surgical research collaboratives in the UK
    Bhangu, Aneel
    Kolias, Angelos G.
    Pinkney, Thomas
    Hall, Nigel J.
    Fitzgerald, J. Edward
    [J]. LANCET, 2013, 382 (9898) : 1091 - 1092
  • [8] Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic and therapeutic role of water-soluble contrast agent in adhesive small bowel obstruction
    Branco, B. C.
    Barmparas, G.
    Schnueriger, B.
    Inaba, K.
    Chan, L. S.
    Demetriades, D.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 (04) : 470 - 478
  • [9] Ceresoli M, 2015, AM J SURG, V211, P1
  • [10] Non-emergency small bowel obstruction: assessment of CT findings that predict need for surgery
    Deshmukh, Swati D.
    Shin, David S.
    Willmann, Juergen K.
    Rosenberg, Jarrett
    Shin, Lewis
    Jeffrey, R. Brooke
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (05) : 982 - 986