Conservation of biodiversity in the Arabuko Sokoke Forest, Kenya

被引:19
作者
Muriithi, S
Kenyon, W
机构
[1] Scottish Agr Coll, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Forest Dept, Nairobi, Kenya
关键词
biodiversity; contingent valuation; forests; global benefits;
D O I
10.1023/A:1016234224819
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Using an economic approach to provide a rationale for rainforest conservation has been a popular exercise in recent years. This paper uses such an approach to assess the net value of the Arabuko Sokoke Forest in Kenya. The economic benefits associated with the forest derived by local and global populations are estimated by combining evidence from existing studies and the results of a contingent valuation study carried out by the authors. These benefits are set against the cost of preserving the forest to the Kenyan Forest Department. Even when the opportunity cost of the forest land is omitted from the costs of forest preservation, and when the revenues generated from the Global Environment Facility (GEF) funded project are included, the costs of forest conservation outweigh the benefits. It is only when non-use and existence values are included (which are not realised by the Kenyan population) that the forest benefits exceed the costs. The paper concludes by arguing that, although some projects within the Arabuko Sokoke Forest have been successful in capturing some of the economic value associated with the forest, more needs to be done to design additional capture mechanisms so that a greater proportion of the global benefit of the forest can be realised by local populations and local governments.
引用
收藏
页码:1437 / 1450
页数:14
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Abelson P, 1996, PROJECT APPRAISAL VA
[2]  
ALFAREZFARIZO B, 1999, J ENV PLANNING MANGE, V42, P23
[3]  
[Anonymous], EC POLICY ENV
[4]  
[Anonymous], EC PROTECTED AREAS N
[5]  
AYIEMBA WO, 1998, BIODIVERSITY UTILISA
[6]  
BANN C, 2000, UNPUB EUR ASS ENV RE
[7]   Valuing public goods: Discrete versus continuous contingent-valuation responses [J].
Boyle, KJ ;
Johnson, FR ;
McCollum, DW ;
Desvousges, WH ;
Dunford, RW ;
Hudson, SP .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1996, 72 (03) :381-396
[8]  
CARSON R, 1994, BIBLIO CONTINGENT VA, P1
[9]  
Carson R. T., 1989, Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method
[10]  
EDWARDSJONES G, 1998, J ENV PLANNING MANAG, V41, P463