Patient-specific quality assurance using machine log files analysis for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)

被引:11
作者
Chow, Vivian U. Y. [1 ]
Kan, Monica W. K. [1 ,2 ]
Chan, Anthony T. C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Clin Oncol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Clin Oncol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2020年 / 21卷 / 11期
关键词
patient-specific QA; log file analysis; stereotactic body radiation therapy; volumetric-modulated arc therapy; plan delivery accuracy; TRAJECTORY LOG; DELIVERY; IMRT; ERRORS; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.13053
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
An in-house trajectory log analysis program (LOGQA) was developed to evaluate the delivery accuracy of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods have been established in LOGQA to provide analysis on dose indices, gantry angles, and multi-leaf collimator (MLC) positions. Between March 2019 and May 2020, 120 VMAT SBRT plans of various treatment sites using flattening filter-free (FFF) mode were evaluated using both LOGQA and phantom measurements. Gantry angles, dose indices, and MLC positions were extracted from log and compared with each plan. Integrated transient fluence map (ITFM) was reconstructed from log to examine the deviation of delivered fluence against the planned one. Average correlation coefficient of dose index versus gantry angle and ITFM for all patients were 1.0000, indicating that the delivered beam parameters were in good agreement with planned values. Maximum deviation of gantry angles and monitor units (MU) of all patients were less than 0.2 degree and 0.03 % respectively. Regarding MLC positions, maximum and root-mean-square (RMS) deviations from planned values were less than 0.6 mm and 0.3 mm respectively, indicating that MLC positions during delivery followed planned values in precise manner. Results of LOGQA were consistent with measurement, where all gamma-index passing rates were larger than 95 %, with 2 %/2 mm criteria. Three types of intentional errors were introduced to patient plan for software validation. LOGQA was found to recognize the introduced errors of MLC positions, gantry angles, and dose indices with magnitudes of 1 mm, 1 degree, and 5 %, respectively, which were masked in phantom measurement. LOGQA was demonstrated to have the potential to reduce or even replace patient-specific QA measurements for SBRT plan delivery provided that the frequency and amount of measurement-based machine-specific QA can be increased to ensure the log files record real values of machine parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 187
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Matched linac stereotactic radiotherapy: An assessment of delivery similarity and distributive patient-specific quality assurance feasibility
    Goodall, Simon K.
    Dunn, Leon
    Dunning, Jonathan
    Munoz, Luis
    Rowshanfarzad, Pejman
    Ebert, Martin A.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 23 (11):
  • [42] Machine learning and lean six sigma for targeted patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans
    Lambri, Nicola
    Dei, Damiano
    Goretti, Giulia
    Crespi, Leonardo
    Brioso, Ricardo Coimbra
    Pelizzoli, Marco
    Parabicoli, Sara
    Bresolin, Andrea
    Gallo, Pasqualina
    La Fauci, Francesco
    Lobefalo, Francesca
    Paganini, Lucia
    Reggiori, Giacomo
    Loiacono, Daniele
    Franzese, Ciro
    Tomatis, Stefano
    Scorsetti, Marta
    Mancosu, Pietro
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31
  • [43] TomoEQA: Dose verification for patient-specific quality assurance in helical tomotherapy using an exit detector
    Han, Min Cheol
    Chang, Kyung Hwan
    Kim, Jihun
    Han, Su Chul
    Park, Kwangwoo
    Kim, Dong Wook
    Kim, Hojin
    Kim, Jin Sung
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 82 : 1 - 6
  • [44] Effects of high-resolution measurements between different multi-row detectors on volumetric modulated arc therapy patient-specific quality assurance
    Kunii, Y.
    Tanabe, Y.
    Higashi, A.
    Nakamoto, A.
    Nishioka, K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2023, 21 (03): : 413 - 420
  • [45] Quantitative evaluation of patient-specific quality assurance using online dosimetry system
    Jae-Yong Jung
    Young-Ju Shin
    Seung-Chang Sohn
    Jung-Whan Min
    Yon-Lae Kim
    Dong-Su Kim
    Bo-Young Choe
    Tae-Suk Suh
    Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 2018, 72 : 312 - 319
  • [46] Towards Effective and Efficient Patient-Specific Quality Assurance for Spot Scanning Proton Therapy
    Zhu, X. Ronald.
    Li, Yupeng
    Mackin, Dennis
    Li, Heng
    Poenisch, Falk
    Lee, Andrew K.
    Mahajan, Anita
    Frank, Steven J.
    Gillin, Michael T.
    Sahoo, Narayan
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    CANCERS, 2015, 7 (02): : 631 - 647
  • [47] Treatment plan complexity quantification for predicting gamma passing rates in patient-specific quality assurance for stereotactic volumetric modulated arc therapy
    Xue, Xudong
    Luan, Shunyao
    Ding, Yi
    Li, Xiangbin
    Li, Dan
    Wang, Jingya
    Ma, Chi
    Jiang, Man
    Wei, Wei
    Wang, Xiao
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (09):
  • [48] Sensitivity of Three Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Systems to MLC Aperture Errors With Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
    Hu, Jinyou
    Gu, Shaoxian
    Wang, Ningyu
    Cui, Fengjie
    Zhang, Shengyuan
    Yin, Chuou
    Cai, Yunzhu
    Gou, Chengjun
    Zou, Lian
    Wu, Zhangwen
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2022, 21
  • [49] Characterization of a novel 2D array dosimeter for patient-specific quality assurance with volumetric arc therapy
    Stathakis, Sotirios
    Myers, Pamela
    Esquivel, Carlos
    Mavroidis, Panayiotis
    Papanikolaou, Nikos
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (07)
  • [50] VOLUMETRIC-MODULATED ARC THERAPY: EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT END-TO-END PATIENT-SPECIFIC QUALITY ASSURANCE
    O'Daniel, Jennifer
    Das, Shiva
    Wu, Q. Jackie
    Yin, Fang-Fang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (05): : 1567 - 1574