Patient-specific quality assurance using machine log files analysis for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)

被引:11
|
作者
Chow, Vivian U. Y. [1 ]
Kan, Monica W. K. [1 ,2 ]
Chan, Anthony T. C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Clin Oncol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Clin Oncol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2020年 / 21卷 / 11期
关键词
patient-specific QA; log file analysis; stereotactic body radiation therapy; volumetric-modulated arc therapy; plan delivery accuracy; TRAJECTORY LOG; DELIVERY; IMRT; ERRORS; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.13053
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
An in-house trajectory log analysis program (LOGQA) was developed to evaluate the delivery accuracy of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods have been established in LOGQA to provide analysis on dose indices, gantry angles, and multi-leaf collimator (MLC) positions. Between March 2019 and May 2020, 120 VMAT SBRT plans of various treatment sites using flattening filter-free (FFF) mode were evaluated using both LOGQA and phantom measurements. Gantry angles, dose indices, and MLC positions were extracted from log and compared with each plan. Integrated transient fluence map (ITFM) was reconstructed from log to examine the deviation of delivered fluence against the planned one. Average correlation coefficient of dose index versus gantry angle and ITFM for all patients were 1.0000, indicating that the delivered beam parameters were in good agreement with planned values. Maximum deviation of gantry angles and monitor units (MU) of all patients were less than 0.2 degree and 0.03 % respectively. Regarding MLC positions, maximum and root-mean-square (RMS) deviations from planned values were less than 0.6 mm and 0.3 mm respectively, indicating that MLC positions during delivery followed planned values in precise manner. Results of LOGQA were consistent with measurement, where all gamma-index passing rates were larger than 95 %, with 2 %/2 mm criteria. Three types of intentional errors were introduced to patient plan for software validation. LOGQA was found to recognize the introduced errors of MLC positions, gantry angles, and dose indices with magnitudes of 1 mm, 1 degree, and 5 %, respectively, which were masked in phantom measurement. LOGQA was demonstrated to have the potential to reduce or even replace patient-specific QA measurements for SBRT plan delivery provided that the frequency and amount of measurement-based machine-specific QA can be increased to ensure the log files record real values of machine parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 187
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A management method for the statistical results of patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Nakamura, Satoshi
    Okamoto, Hiroyuki
    Wakita, Akihisa
    Umezawa, Rei
    Takahashi, Kana
    Inaba, Koji
    Murakami, Naoya
    Kato, Toru
    Igaki, Hiroshi
    Ito, Yoshinori
    Abe, Yoshihisa
    Itami, Jun
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2017, 58 (04) : 572 - 578
  • [32] Comparison of patient-specific intensity modulated radiation therapy quality assurance for the prostate across multiple institutions
    Kubo, Kazuki
    Monzen, Hajime
    Shimomura, Kohei
    Matsumoto, Kenji
    Sato, Tomoharu
    Tamura, Mikoto
    Nakamatsu, Kiyoshi
    Ishii, Kentaro
    Kawamorita, Ryu
    REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2019, 24 (06) : 600 - 605
  • [33] Machine Learning for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of VMAT: Prediction and Classification Accuracy
    Li, Jiaqi
    Wang, Le
    Zhang, Xile
    Liu, Lu
    Li, Jun
    Chan, Maria F.
    Sui, Jing
    Yang, Ruijie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (04): : 893 - 902
  • [34] The effect of measurement geometry on patient specific QA pass/fail rates for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) Plans
    Hadsell, Courtney S.
    Lenards, Nishele.
    Hunzeker, Ashley.
    Tallhamer, Michael J.
    Hadsell, Michael J.
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2021, 46 (04) : 389 - 397
  • [35] A TPS integrated machine learning tool for predicting patient-specific quality assurance outcomes in volumetric-modulated arc therapy
    Noblet, Caroline
    Maunet, Mathis
    Duthy, Marie
    Coste, Frederic
    Moreau, Matthieu
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 118
  • [36] Highly efficient and sensitive patient-specific quality assurance for spot-scanned proton therapy
    Johnson, J. E.
    Beltran, C.
    Tseung, H. Wan Chan
    Mundy, D. W.
    Kruse, J. J.
    Whitaker, T. J.
    Herman, M. G.
    Furutani, K. M.
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (02):
  • [37] Quality assurance device for four-dimensional IMRT or SBRT and respiratory gating using patient-specific intrafraction motion kernels
    Nelms, Benjamin E.
    Ehler, Eric
    Bragg, Henry
    Tome, Wolfgang A.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 8 (04): : 152 - 168
  • [38] Prediction of patient-specific quality assurance for volumetric modulated arc therapy using radiomics-based machine learning with dose distribution
    Ishizaka, Natsuki
    Kinoshita, Tomotaka
    Sakai, Madoka
    Tanabe, Shunpei
    Nakano, Hisashi
    Tanabe, Satoshi
    Nakamura, Sae
    Mayumi, Kazuki
    Akamatsu, Shinya
    Nishikata, Takayuki
    Takizawa, Takeshi
    Yamada, Takumi
    Sakai, Hironori
    Kaidu, Motoki
    Sasamoto, Ryuta
    Ishikawa, Hiroyuki
    Utsunomiya, Satoru
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (01):
  • [39] Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Protocol for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy using Dose Volume Histogram
    Low, Christopher
    Toye, Warren
    Phung, Peter
    Huston, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 43 (02) : 112 - 118
  • [40] Analysis of Aperture-based Complexity Metrics and Their Effect on Patient-specific Quality Assurance in Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy Planning
    Saroj, Dinesh Kumar
    Yadav, Suresh
    Paliwal, Neetu
    Shende, Ravindra Bhagwat
    Gupta, Gaurav
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2025, 50 (01) : 46 - 54