Auditors' Communications with Audit Committees: The Influence of the Audit Committee's Oversight Approach

被引:19
作者
Fiolleau, Krista [1 ]
Hoang, Kris [2 ]
Pomeroy, Bradley [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
来源
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY | 2019年 / 38卷 / 02期
关键词
accounting issues; audit committee oversight; auditor communications; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; NEGOTIATION; MANAGEMENT; INTERVENTION; JUDGMENTS; WORK; RISK;
D O I
10.2308/ajpt-52261
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Policymakers have identified effective communications between the auditor and the audit committee (AC) as an indicator of a quality audit, but little is known about the factors auditors consider when deciding what to communicate about significant accounting issues. We propose auditors use the AC's oversight approach as a cue for the level of detail in their communications that is necessary to satisfy the AC's preferences for auditors' insights on issues that were resolved with management. In our experiment, auditors resolved an inventory obsolescence issue with a hypothetical CFO, and then wrote a communication about it for the AC. We manipulate the AC's preference for getting involved in the issue resolution process and its reputation for asking questions. Our results, supplemented by findings from audit partner interviews, suggest auditors tailor their communications to the AC's oversight approach, the AC's industry and accounting knowledge, and the AC chair's preferred communication style.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 150
页数:26
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]   Principles-Based versus Rules-Based Accounting Standards: The Influence of Standard Precision and Audit Committee Strength on Financial Reporting Decisions [J].
Agoglia, Christopher P. ;
Doupnik, Timothy S. ;
Tsakumis, George T. .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2011, 86 (03) :747-767
[2]  
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), 2006, AUD COMM THOS CHARG
[3]  
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), 2009, COMM INT CONTR DEF I
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Audit committee: leading practices and trends
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, ISS ACCOUNT EDUC, DOI DOI 10.2308/IACE.2002.17.1.27
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, A Framework for Audit Quality: Key Elements That Create an Environment for Audit Quality
[7]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[8]   The Audit Committee Oversight Process [J].
Beasley, Mark S. ;
Carcello, Joseph V. ;
Hermanson, Dana R. ;
Neal, Terry L. .
CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2009, 26 (01) :65-+
[9]  
Beattie V.A., 2011, REACHING KEY FINANCI
[10]   Do Approaching Deadlines Influence Auditors' Materiality Assessments? [J].
Bennett, G. Bradley ;
Hatfield, Richard C. .
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2017, 36 (04) :29-48