Can public R&D subsidy facilitate firms? exploratory innovation? The heterogeneous effects between central and local subsidy programs

被引:174
作者
Gao, Yuchen [1 ]
Hu, Yimei [2 ]
Liu, Xielin [3 ]
Zhang, Huanren [4 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Aalborg Univ, Sch Business, Aalborg, Denmark
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Econ & Business, Odense M, Denmark
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
exploratory innovation; central and local governments; industrial agglomeration; public R& amp; D subsidy;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2021.104221
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Public R&D subsidy is a commonly adopted policy instrument to promote firms? exploratory innovation that encourages novel knowledge learning. Under the multi-level institutional settings such as China, however, it is unclear in current literature as to whether central and local-level governmental R&D subsidy programs exert heterogeneous influences on recipient firms? exploratory innovation. By employing an exclusive panel data of manufacturing firms in Jiangsu Province, this study investigates the heterogeneous effects of central and local R&D subsidies on firms? exploratory innovation. Considering that regional innovation contexts may influence the learning and innovation of subsidy recipients, we further test the interaction effects of specialized industrial agglomeration and R&D subsidies. We find that R&D subsidies in general do promote firms? exploratory innovation, and the local R&D subsidy exhibits a more salient effect. In addition, the positive effect of subsidies is stronger for the recipients in a highly specialized industrial agglomeration. This study contributes to R&D subsidy literature and extends our knowledge on the different roles of central and local governments in firms? learning behaviors and technological upgrading.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   Matching on the Estimated Propensity Score [J].
Abadie, Alberto ;
Imbens, Guido W. .
ECONOMETRICA, 2016, 84 (02) :781-807
[2]   The impact of R&D subsidies on R&D employment composition [J].
Afcha, Sergio ;
Garcia-Quevedo, Jose .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2016, 25 (06) :955-975
[3]   Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations [J].
Ahuja, G ;
Katila, R .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2004, 25 (8-9) :887-907
[4]   Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions [J].
Ahuja, G ;
Lampert, CM .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2001, 22 (6-7) :521-543
[5]   ORGANIZATIONAL SPONSORSHIP AND FOUNDING ENVIRONMENTS: A CONTINGENCY VIEW ON THE SURVIVAL OF BUSINESS-INCUBATED FIRMS, 1994-2007 [J].
Amezcua, Alejandro S. ;
Grimes, Matthew G. ;
Bradley, Steven W. ;
Wiklund, Johan .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 56 (06) :1628-1654
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, DOI DOI 10.1002/smj.2301
[7]   The "Matthew effect" in R&D public subsidies: The Italian evidence [J].
Antonelli, Cristiano ;
Crespi, Francesco .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2013, 80 (08) :1523-1534
[8]  
Aschhoff B., 2009, 09032 ZEW CTR EUR RE
[9]   Who's right, Marshall or Jacobs? The localization versus urbanization debate [J].
Beaudry, Catherine ;
Schiffauerova, Andrea .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (02) :318-337
[10]   Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries [J].
Benner, MJ .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2002, 47 (04) :676-706