Radiographic characterization of the B2 glenoid: the effect of computed tomographic axis orientation

被引:42
作者
Chalmers, Peter N. [1 ]
Salazar, Dane [1 ]
Chamberlain, Aaron [1 ]
Keener, Jay D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Glenohumeral osteoarthritis; total shoulder arthroplasty; computed tomography; glenoid version; glenoid inclination; glenoid depth; SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY; PRIMARY OSTEOARTHRITIS; VERSION; INCLINATION; FEASIBILITY; SCAN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2016.07.021
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Glenoid retroversion may accelerate glenoid loosening after total shoulder arthroplasty. Accurate measurement of preoperative glenoid deformity is critical for decision-making and prognostication. The purpose of this study was to determine whether glenoid version, inclination, and depth and humeral subluxation measurements on computed tomography (CT) scan slices oriented in the plane of the body differ from those oriented in the scapular plane and those obtained by automated 3-dimensional reconstruction software in the setting of a biconcave B2-type glenoid. Methods: Thirty-one preoperative CT scans in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty withWalch B2-type glenoids underwent a standardized measurement protocol by 3 observers. Glenoid version, inclination, and depth and humeral subluxation were measured on 2-dimensional CT images in the plane of the body, on 2-dimensional images in the plane of the scapula, and by a validated, automated 3-dimensional software program. Results: Correction of CT slice axis into the plane of the scapula decreased measured retroversion by 2.4 degrees to 4.7 degrees (P <.004) and inclination by 21 degrees (P < .001). Whereas uncorrected version measurements do not differ from automated software measurements, corrected measurements do (P < .001). Whereas corrected inclination measurements do not differ from automated measurements, uncorrected measurements do (P < .001). Automated measurements differed from both corrected and uncorrected subluxation (P < .001 in both cases). Conclusion: If CT images are not reoriented into the plane of the scapula, version and inclination will be significantly overestimated. In the setting of a retroverted, deformed glenoid, automated software may produce similar inclination measurements to corrected 2-dimensional CT, but it produces significantly altered measurements of version and subluxation. (C) 2017 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 264
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Variability of measurement of glenoid version on computed tomography scan [J].
Bokor, DJ ;
O'Sullivan, MD ;
Hazan, GJ .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 1999, 8 (06) :595-598
[2]   Aseptic glenoid loosening or failure in total shoulder arthroplasty: revision with glenoid reimplantation [J].
Bonnevialle, Nicolas ;
Melis, Barbara ;
Neyton, Lionel ;
Favard, Luc ;
Mole, Daniel ;
Walch, Gilles ;
Boileau, Pascal .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2013, 22 (06) :745-751
[3]   Two-Dimensional Glenoid Version Measurements Vary with Coronal and Sagittal Scapular Rotation [J].
Bryce, Chris D. ;
Davison, Andrew C. ;
Lewis, Gregory S. ;
Wang, Li ;
Flemming, Donald J. ;
Armstrong, April D. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2010, 92A (03) :692-699
[4]   Comparison of standard two-dimensional and three-dimensional corrected glenoid version measurements [J].
Budge, Matthew D. ;
Lewis, Gregory S. ;
Schaefer, Eric ;
Coquia, Stephanie ;
Flemming, Donald J. ;
Armstrong, April D. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2011, 20 (04) :577-583
[5]   Do Patients Return to Sports and Work After Total Shoulder Replacement Surgery? [J].
Buelhoff, Matthias ;
Sattler, Peter ;
Bruckner, Thomas ;
Loew, Markus ;
Zeifang, Felix ;
Raiss, Patric .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (02) :423-427
[6]   Outcomes of anatomic shoulder arthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis in type B glenoids [J].
Chin, Paul C. ;
Hachadorian, Michael E. ;
Pulido, Pamela A. ;
Munro, Michelle L. ;
Meric, Gokhan ;
Hoenecke, Heinz R., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2015, 24 (12) :1888-1893
[7]   Glenoid size, inclination, and version: An anatomic study [J].
Churchill, RS ;
Brems, JJ ;
Kotschi, H .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2001, 10 (04) :327-332
[8]   Feasibility of an osteochondral allograft for biologic glenoid resurfacing [J].
Cvetanovich, Gregory L. ;
Chalmers, Peter N. ;
Yanke, Adam B. ;
Gupta, Anil K. ;
Klosterman, Emma L. ;
Verma, Nikhil N. ;
Romeo, Anthony A. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2014, 23 (04) :477-484
[9]   Comparison of glenoid inclination angle using different clinical imaging modalities [J].
Daggett, Matthew ;
Werner, Birgit ;
Gauci, Marc Olivier ;
Chaoui, Jean ;
Walch, Gilles .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2016, 25 (02) :180-185
[10]   Risks of loosening of a prosthetic glenoid implanted in retroversion [J].
Farron, Alain ;
Terrier, Alexandre ;
Buechler, Philippe .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2006, 15 (04) :521-526