Association Between Older Age and Increasing Gleason Score

被引:22
作者
Muralidhar, Vinayak [1 ]
Ziehr, David R. [2 ]
Mahal, Brandon A. [2 ]
Chen, Yu-Wei [3 ]
Nezolosky, Michelle D. [4 ,5 ]
Viswanathan, Vidya B. [4 ,5 ]
Choueiri, Toni K. [6 ,7 ]
Sweeney, Christopher J. [6 ,7 ]
Quoc-Dien Trinh [8 ]
Nguyen, Paul L. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Harvard Mit Div Hlth Sci & Technol, Boston, MA USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Univ, TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA USA
[4] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Med Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[8] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Urol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Age groups; Cancer screening; Gleason score; Prostate cancer; Prostate-specific antigen; TASK-FORCE RECOMMENDATION; PROSTATE-CANCER MORTALITY; STAGE T1C; GRADE; DIAGNOSIS; IMPACT; DEDIFFERENTIATION; CARCINOMA; GUIDELINE; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.clgc.2015.05.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
There are few data about the risks versus benefits of screening older men for prostate cancer. Using a large national database, we found that older men diagnosed with prostate cancer have a higher probability of harboring high-risk or high-grade disease. These data could be used to help counsel healthy older men about the risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening. Introduction: In order to help inform the discussion about the risks versus benefits of prostate cancer screening among older men, we determined whether advanced age is associated with a higher probability of harboring high-grade or high-rik disease. Patients and Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify 383,039 men diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2004-2011. The percentage of patients diagnosed with low-, intermediate-, or high-risk disease or a Gleason score of 6, 7, or 8 to 10 was calculated by age range. As a secondary analysis, we examined whether this relationship was different in 2010-2011 versus 2007-2008 (before and after the 2009 publication of screening trials). Results: The probability of Gleason score 8 to 10 or high-risk disease increased significantly with increasing age. The percentage of Gleason score 8 to 10 disease among men ages 50 to 54, 70 to 74, and 80 to 84 years was 8.9%, 16.2%, and 28.5%, respectively, and the percentage of high-risk disease was 14.3%, 22.4%, and 38.7% (P<.001). There were similar relationships among men with stage T1c disease. In addition, older men experienced a significant increase in the relative probability of high-risk or high-grade disease from 2007-2008 to 2010-2011. Conclusion: In this large US-based cohort, older men had a much higher probability of high-grade or high-risk prostate cancer. Physicians and patients should take into account the higher risk of more aggressive or advanced disease in older men when discussing the risks and benefits of prostate-specific antigen screening with healthy older men with a substantial life expectancy. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 530
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[21]  
Kapoor Deepak A, 2013, Rev Urol, V15, P137
[22]   Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement [J].
Moyer, Virginia A. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 157 (02) :120-+
[23]   Gleason Grade Progression Is Uncommon [J].
Penney, Kathryn L. ;
Stampfer, Meir J. ;
Jahn, Jaquelyn L. ;
Sinnott, Jennifer A. ;
Flavin, Richard ;
Rider, Jennifer R. ;
Finn, Stephen ;
Giovannucci, Edward ;
Sesso, Howard D. ;
Loda, Massimo ;
Mucci, Lorelei A. ;
Fiorentino, Michelangelo .
CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 73 (16) :5163-5168
[24]   Impact of the 2008 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation to Discontinue Prostate Cancer Screening Among Male Medicare Beneficiaries [J].
Ross, Joseph S. ;
Wang, Rong ;
Long, Jessica B. ;
Gross, Cary P. ;
Ma, Xiaomei .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 172 (20) :1601-1603
[25]   Screening and Prostate-Cancer Mortality in a Randomized European Study [J].
Schroeder, Fritz H. ;
Hugosson, Jonas ;
Roobol, Monique J. ;
Tammela, Teuvo L. J. ;
Ciatto, Stefano ;
Nelen, Vera ;
Kwiatkowski, Maciej ;
Lujan, Marcos ;
Lilja, Hans ;
Zappa, Marco ;
Denis, Louis J. ;
Recker, Franz ;
Berenguer, Antonio ;
Maattanen, Liisa ;
Bangma, Chris H. ;
Aus, Gunnar ;
Villers, Arnauld ;
Rebillard, Xavier ;
van der Kwast, Theodorus ;
Blijenberg, Bert G. ;
Moss, Sue M. ;
de Koning, Harry J. ;
Auvinen, Anssi .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (13) :1320-1328
[26]   AGE AND SURVIVAL IN PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA [J].
SMEDLEY, HM ;
SINNOTT, M ;
FREEDMAN, LS ;
MACASKILL, P ;
NAYLOR, CPE ;
PILLERS, EMK .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1983, 55 (05) :529-533
[27]   Assessing prostate cancer risk: Results from the prostate cancer prevention trial [J].
Thompson, IM ;
Ankerst, DP ;
Chi, C ;
Goodman, PJ ;
Tangen, CM ;
Lucia, MS ;
Feng, ZD ;
Parnes, HL ;
Coltman, CA .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (08) :529-534
[28]   Limitations in the use of serum prostate specific antigen levels to monitor patients after treatment for prostate cancer [J].
Vicini, FA ;
Vargas, C ;
Abner, A ;
Kestin, L ;
Horwitz, E ;
Martinez, A .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (05) :1456-1462
[29]   American Cancer Society Guideline for the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer Update 2010 [J].
Wolf, Andrew M. D. ;
Wender, Richard C. ;
Etzioni, Ruth B. ;
Thompson, Ian M. ;
D'Amico, Anthony V. ;
Volk, Robert J. ;
Brooks, Durado D. ;
Dash, Chiranjeev ;
Guessous, Idris ;
Andrews, Kimberly ;
DeSantis, Carol ;
Smith, Robert A. .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2010, 60 (02) :70-98