Association Between Older Age and Increasing Gleason Score

被引:22
作者
Muralidhar, Vinayak [1 ]
Ziehr, David R. [2 ]
Mahal, Brandon A. [2 ]
Chen, Yu-Wei [3 ]
Nezolosky, Michelle D. [4 ,5 ]
Viswanathan, Vidya B. [4 ,5 ]
Choueiri, Toni K. [6 ,7 ]
Sweeney, Christopher J. [6 ,7 ]
Quoc-Dien Trinh [8 ]
Nguyen, Paul L. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Harvard Mit Div Hlth Sci & Technol, Boston, MA USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Univ, TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA USA
[4] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Med Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[8] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Urol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Age groups; Cancer screening; Gleason score; Prostate cancer; Prostate-specific antigen; TASK-FORCE RECOMMENDATION; PROSTATE-CANCER MORTALITY; STAGE T1C; GRADE; DIAGNOSIS; IMPACT; DEDIFFERENTIATION; CARCINOMA; GUIDELINE; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.clgc.2015.05.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
There are few data about the risks versus benefits of screening older men for prostate cancer. Using a large national database, we found that older men diagnosed with prostate cancer have a higher probability of harboring high-risk or high-grade disease. These data could be used to help counsel healthy older men about the risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening. Introduction: In order to help inform the discussion about the risks versus benefits of prostate cancer screening among older men, we determined whether advanced age is associated with a higher probability of harboring high-grade or high-rik disease. Patients and Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify 383,039 men diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2004-2011. The percentage of patients diagnosed with low-, intermediate-, or high-risk disease or a Gleason score of 6, 7, or 8 to 10 was calculated by age range. As a secondary analysis, we examined whether this relationship was different in 2010-2011 versus 2007-2008 (before and after the 2009 publication of screening trials). Results: The probability of Gleason score 8 to 10 or high-risk disease increased significantly with increasing age. The percentage of Gleason score 8 to 10 disease among men ages 50 to 54, 70 to 74, and 80 to 84 years was 8.9%, 16.2%, and 28.5%, respectively, and the percentage of high-risk disease was 14.3%, 22.4%, and 38.7% (P<.001). There were similar relationships among men with stage T1c disease. In addition, older men experienced a significant increase in the relative probability of high-risk or high-grade disease from 2007-2008 to 2010-2011. Conclusion: In this large US-based cohort, older men had a much higher probability of high-grade or high-risk prostate cancer. Physicians and patients should take into account the higher risk of more aggressive or advanced disease in older men when discussing the risks and benefits of prostate-specific antigen screening with healthy older men with a substantial life expectancy. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 530
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   The association between patient age and prostate cancer stage and grade at diagnosis [J].
Alibhai, SMH ;
Krahn, MD ;
Fleshner, NE ;
Cohen, MM ;
Tomlinson, GA ;
Naglie, G .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 94 (03) :303-306
[2]   Mortality Results from a Randomized Prostate-Cancer Screening Trial [J].
Andriole, Gerald L. ;
Grubb, Robert L., III ;
Buys, Saundra S. ;
Chia, David ;
Church, Timothy R. ;
Fouad, Mona N. ;
Gelmann, Edward P. ;
Kvale, Paul A. ;
Reding, Douglas J. ;
Weissfeld, Joel L. ;
Yokochi, Lance A. ;
Crawford, E. David ;
O'Brien, Barbara ;
Clapp, Jonathan D. ;
Rathmell, Joshua M. ;
Riley, Thomas L. ;
Hayes, Richard B. ;
Kramer, Barnett S. ;
Izmirlian, Grant ;
Miller, Anthony B. ;
Pinsky, Paul F. ;
Prorok, Philip C. ;
Gohagan, John K. ;
Berg, Christine D. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (13) :1310-1319
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, CLIN PRACT GUID ONC
[4]  
[Anonymous], SEER STAT DAT INC SE
[5]   Is it necessary to separate clinical stage T1c from T2 prostate adenocarcinoma? [J].
Armatys, SA ;
Koch, MO ;
Bihrle, R ;
Gardner, TA ;
Cheng, L .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 96 (06) :777-780
[6]   The Impact of Recent Screening Recommendations on Prostate Cancer Screening in a Large Health Care System [J].
Aslani, Afshin ;
Minnillo, Brian J. ;
Johnson, Ben ;
Cherullo, Edward E. ;
Ponsky, Lee E. ;
Abouassaly, Robert .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (06) :1737-1742
[7]   Impact of Age at Diagnosis on Prostate Cancer Treatment and Survival [J].
Bechis, Seth K. ;
Carroll, Peter R. ;
Cooperberg, Matthew R. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (02) :235-241
[8]  
Billis Athanase, 2006, Int. braz j urol., V32, P165, DOI 10.1590/S1677-55382006000200006
[9]   RELATIONSHIP OF AGE TO HISTOLOGIC GRADE IN PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
BOREK, D ;
BUTCHER, D ;
HASSANEIN, K ;
HOLMES, F .
PROSTATE, 1990, 16 (04) :305-311
[10]   Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: AUA Guideline [J].
Carter, H. Ballentine ;
Albertsen, Peter C. ;
Barry, Michael J. ;
Etzioni, Ruth ;
Freedland, Stephen J. ;
Greene, Kirsten Lynn ;
Holmberg, Lars ;
Kantoff, Philip ;
Konety, Badrinath R. ;
Murad, Mohammad Hassan ;
Penson, David F. ;
Zietman, Anthony L. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 190 (02) :419-426