Emergent Challenges and Opportunities to Sustaining Age-friendly Initiatives: Qualitative Findings from a Canadian Age-friendly Funding Program

被引:35
作者
Russell, Elizabeth [1 ]
Skinner, Mark W. [2 ]
Fowler, Ken [3 ]
机构
[1] Trent Univ, Dept Psychol, 1600 West Bank Dr, Peterborough, ON K9L 0G2, Canada
[2] Trent Univ, Trent Sch Environm, Rural Aging Hlth & Social Care, Peterborough, ON, Canada
[3] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Dept Psychol, St John, NF, Canada
关键词
Age-friendly communities; rural aging; COMMUNITY INITIATIVES; RURAL COMMUNITIES; PERSPECTIVES; FRAMEWORKS;
D O I
10.1080/08959420.2019.1636595
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学]; R592 [老年病学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100203 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Age-friendly initiatives often are motivated by a single funding injection from national or sub-national governments, frequently challenging human and financial resources at the community level. To address this problem, this paper examines the challenges and opportunities to sustaining age-friendly programs in the context of a Canadian age-friendly funding program. Based on a qualitative thematic content analysis of interview data with 35 age-friendly committee members drawn from 11 communities, results show that age-friendly sustainability may be conceptualized as an implementation gap between early development stages and long-term viability. Consistent over-dependence on volunteers and on committees' limited capacity may create burnout, limiting sustainability and the extent to which communities can truly become "age-friendly". To close this implementation gap while still remaining true to the grass-roots intention of the global age-friendly agenda, sustainable initiatives should include community champions, multi-disciplinary and cross-sector collaborations, and systemic municipal involvement.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 217
页数:20
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Braun V., 2006, Qual Res Psychol, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, DOI 10.1080/10875549.2021.1929659, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
[2]   A Manifesto for the Age-Friendly Movement: Developing a New Urban Agenda [J].
Buffel, Tine ;
Phillipson, Chris .
JOURNAL OF AGING & SOCIAL POLICY, 2018, 30 (02) :173-192
[3]  
Community Accounts, 2018, PROF ALL COMM
[4]   Are rural health professionals also social entrepreneurs? [J].
Farmer, Jane ;
Kilpatrick, Sue .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2009, 69 (11) :1651-1658
[5]   An Overview of Age-Friendly Cities and Communities Around the World [J].
Fitzgerald, Kelly G. ;
Caro, Francis G. .
JOURNAL OF AGING & SOCIAL POLICY, 2014, 26 (1-2) :1-18
[6]   Economic crisis and social capital: The story of two rural fishing communities [J].
Fowler, Ken ;
Etchegary, Holly .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 81 :319-341
[7]  
Golant S.M., 2014, Age-friendly communities: Are we expecting too much? IRPP Insight 5
[8]  
Government of NL, 2007, PROV HLTH AG POL FRA
[9]  
Grantmakers in Aging, 2015, GUIDING PRINCIPLES S
[10]   Getting Started: An Empirically Derived Logic Model for Age-Friendly Community Initiatives in the Early Planning Phase [J].
Greenfield, Emily A. .
JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGICAL SOCIAL WORK, 2018, 61 (03) :295-312