S-containing copolymer as cathode material in poly(ethylene oxide)-based all-solid-state Li-S batteries

被引:47
作者
Gracia, Ismael [1 ]
Ben Youcef, Hicham [2 ]
Judez, Xabier [1 ]
Oteo, Uxue [1 ]
Zhang, Heng [1 ]
Li, Chunmei [1 ]
Rodriguez-Martinez, Lide M. [1 ]
Armand, Michel [1 ]
机构
[1] CIC Energigune, Parque Tecnol Alava,Albert Einstein 48, Minano 01510, Alava, Spain
[2] Mohammed VI Polytech Univ, Lot 660, Hay Moulay Rachid 43150, Ben Guerir, Morocco
关键词
Li-S batteries; Cathode materials; Organosulfur; Inverse vulcanization; PEO-based all-solid-state lithium batteries; LITHIUM-SULFUR BATTERIES; POLYMER ELECTROLYTES; INVERSE VULCANIZATION; ELEMENTAL SULFUR; ION BATTERIES; METAL ANODE; SALT; CHALLENGES; CELLS; XPS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.052
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Inverse vulcanization copolymers (p(S-DVB)) from the radical polymerization of elemental sulfur and divinylbenzene (DVB) have been studied as cathode active materials in poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)-based all-solid-state Li-S cells. The Li-S cell comprising the optimized p(S-DVB) cathode (80:20 w/w S/DVB ratio) and lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide/PEO (LiFSI/PEO) electrolyte shows high specific capacity (ca. 800 mAh g(-1)) and high Coulombic efficiency for 50 cycles. Most importantly, polysulfide (PS) shuttle is highly mitigated due to the strong interactions of PS species with polymer backbone in p(S-DVB). This is demonstrated by the stable cycling of the p(S-DVB)-based cell using lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI)/PEO electrolyte, where successful charging cannot be achieved even at the first cycle with plain elemental S-based cathode material due to the severe PS shuttle phenomenon. These results suggest that inverse vulcanization copolymers are promising alternatives to elemental sulfur for enhancing the electrochemical performance of PEO-based all-solid-state Li-S cells.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 152
页数:5
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Agostini M., 2015, SCI REP, V5, P2045
  • [2] Lithium-sulfur batteries-the solution is in the electrolyte, but is the electrolyte a solution?
    Barghamadi, Marzieh
    Best, Adam S.
    Bhatt, Anand I.
    Hollenkamp, Anthony F.
    Musameh, Mustafa
    Rees, Robert J.
    Ruether, Thomas
    [J]. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2014, 7 (12) : 3902 - 3920
  • [3] The gap between long lifespan Li-S coin and pouch cells: The importance of lithium metal anode protection
    Cheng, Xin-Bing
    Yan, Chong
    Huang, Jia-Qi
    Li, Peng
    Zhu, Lin
    Zhao, Lida
    Zhang, Yingying
    Zhu, Wancheng
    Yang, Shu-Ting
    Zhang, Qiang
    [J]. ENERGY STORAGE MATERIALS, 2017, 6 : 18 - 25
  • [4] A Review of Solid Electrolyte Interphases on Lithium Metal Anode
    Cheng, Xin-Bing
    Zhang, Rui
    Zhao, Chen-Zi
    Wei, Fei
    Zhang, Ji-Guang
    Zhang, Qiang
    [J]. ADVANCED SCIENCE, 2016, 3 (03)
  • [5] Chung WJ, 2013, NAT CHEM, V5, P518, DOI [10.1038/NCHEM.1624, 10.1038/nchem.1624]
  • [6] Nanocomposite polymer electrolytes for lithium batteries
    Croce, F
    Appetecchi, GB
    Persi, L
    Scrosati, B
    [J]. NATURE, 1998, 394 (6692) : 456 - 458
  • [7] Eshetu G. G., 2017, ANGEW CHEM INT EDIT, V129, P1
  • [8] In-Depth Interfacial Chemistry and Reactivity Focused Investigation of Lithium-Imide- and Lithium-Imidazole-Based Electrolytes
    Eshetu, Gebrekidan Gebresilassie
    Diemant, Thomas
    Grugeon, Sylvie
    Behm, R. Juergen
    Laruelle, Stephane
    Armand, Michel
    Passerini, Stefano
    [J]. ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES, 2016, 8 (25) : 16087 - 16100
  • [9] Challenges and current development of sulfur cathode in lithium-sulfur battery
    Fu, Chengyin
    Guo, Juchen
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 13 : 53 - 62
  • [10] Inverse vulcanization of sulfur with divinylbenzene: Stable and easy processable cathode material for lithium-sulfur batteries
    Gomez, Inaki
    Mecerreyes, David
    Alberto Blazquez, J.
    Leonet, Olatz
    Ben Youcef, Hicham
    Li, Chunmei
    Luis Gomez-Camer, Juan
    Bundarchuk, Oleksandr
    Rodriguez-Martinez, Lide
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2016, 329 : 72 - 78