Quantitative and qualitative assessment of acute myocardial injury by CMR at multiple time points after acute myocardial infarction

Background: Recent experimental studies have shown a dynamic time course of myocardial edema with an initial wave of edematous reaction within hours after reperfusion which almost resolved at 24 h. However, this dynamic pattern appears to be absent in clinical cohort studies. Thus far, no studies have combined a quantitative and qualitative assessment of acute myocardial injury in a large clinical cohort to explain these divergent findings. Methods: A cohort of 225 patients (59 +/- 11 years, 83% men) with successfully reperfused STEMI within 12 h of symptom onset were included. Quantitative measurements of myocardial damage such as T1 mapping and T2 triple short-tau inversion recovery (STIR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and their impact on area-at-risk (AAR), infarct size (IS), and myocardial salvage index (MSI) were assessed at different time points. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and linear regression analysis was used to compare myocardial damage at the different time points. Results: A small fraction of patients underwent CMR within 24 h of reperfusion (17/225, 7.6%). No significant variations in AAR, IS, MSI, T2 STIR CNR, or native T1 maps were observed between the different time points after reperfusion. Time of CMR was not a significant predictor of AAR (P = 0.90), IS (P = 0.27), MSI (P = 0.23) or T2 STIR CNR (P = 0.23). Conclusions: The majority of CMR exams in STEMI patients are performed outside the dynamic time window of early post-MI edema. The stable pattern of markers of acute myocardial damage at different time points suggests these markers are reliable for the prognostication of patients after STEMI. (c) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.