Robust MPC for tracking constrained unicycle robots with additive disturbances

被引:120
作者
Sun, Zhongqi [1 ]
Dai, Li [1 ]
Liu, Kun [1 ]
Xia, Yuanqing [1 ]
Johansson, Karl Henrik [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Automat, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Sch Elect Engn, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 北京市自然科学基金;
关键词
Robust control; Model predictive control (MPC); Unicycle robots; Bounded disturbances; MODEL-PREDICTIVE CONTROL; SEMIAUTONOMOUS GROUND VEHICLES; NONHOLONOMIC MOBILE ROBOTS; LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITIES; RECEDING HORIZON CONTROL; TIME NONLINEAR-SYSTEMS; OUTPUT-FEEDBACK; STABILITY; ALGORITHM; SCHEME;
D O I
10.1016/j.automatica.2017.12.048
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Two robust model predictive control (MPC) schemes are proposed for tracking unicycle robots with input constraint and bounded disturbances: tube-MPC and nominal robust MPC (NRMPC). In tube-MPC, the control signal consists of a control action and a nonlinear feedback law based on the deviation of the actual states from the states of a nominal system. It renders the actual trajectory within a tube centered along the optimal trajectory of the nominal system. Recursive feasibility and input-to-state stability are established and the constraints are ensured by tightening the input domain and the terminal region. In NRMPC, an optimal control sequence is obtained by solving an optimization problem based on the current state, and then the first portion of this sequence is applied to the real system in an open-loop manner during each sampling period. The state of the nominal system model is updated by the actual state at each step, which provides additional feedback. By introducing a robust state constraint and tightening the terminal region, recursive feasibility and input-to-state stability are guaranteed. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of both strategies proposed. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 184
页数:13
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Adaldo A, 2016, IEEE DECIS CONTR P, P2207, DOI 10.1109/CDC.2016.7798591
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, P 9 C AUTONOMOUS ROB
[3]  
Carvalho A, 2013, IEEE INT C INTELL TR, P2335, DOI 10.1109/ITSC.2013.6728576
[4]   Leader-Follower Formation Control of Multiple Non-holonomic Mobile Robots Incorporating a Receding-horizon Scheme [J].
Chen, Jian ;
Sun, Dong ;
Yang, Jie ;
Chen, Haoyao .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS RESEARCH, 2010, 29 (06) :727-747
[5]   Systems with persistent disturbances: predictive control with restricted constraints [J].
Chisci, L ;
Rossiter, JA ;
Zappa, G .
AUTOMATICA, 2001, 37 (07) :1019-1028
[6]   An interior trust region approach for nonlinear minimization subject to bounds [J].
Coleman, TF ;
Li, YY .
SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION, 1996, 6 (02) :418-445
[7]   Cooperative distributed stochastic MPC for systems with state estimation and coupled probabilistic constraints [J].
Dai, Li ;
Xia, Yuanqing ;
Gao, Yulong ;
Kouvaritakis, Basil ;
Cannon, Mark .
AUTOMATICA, 2015, 61 :89-96
[8]   A vision-based formation control framework [J].
Das, AK ;
Fierro, R ;
Kumar, V ;
Ostrowski, JP ;
Spletzer, J ;
Taylor, CJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, 2002, 18 (05) :813-825
[9]   Modeling and control of formations of nonholonomic mobile robots [J].
Desai, JP ;
Ostrowski, JP ;
Kumar, V .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, 2001, 17 (06) :905-908
[10]  
Eqtami A, 2013, IEEE DECIS CONTR P, P7384, DOI 10.1109/CDC.2013.6761061