Does better environmental, social, and governance induce better corporate green innovation: The mediating role of financing constraints

被引:148
作者
Zhai, Yuming [1 ]
Cai, Zhenghuan [1 ]
Lin, Han [2 ]
Yuan, Ming [3 ]
Mao, Ye [2 ]
Yu, Mingchuan [4 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Inst Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Audit Univ, Sch Engn Audit, Jiangsu Key Lab Publ Project Audit, Nanjing 211815, Peoples R China
[3] Guangzhou Univ, Sch Management, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Normal Univ, Sch Finance & Business, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ESG; financing constraints; green innovation; sustainable development; CASH FLOW SENSITIVITIES; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; AGENCY COSTS; DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT; STAKEHOLDER PRESSURES; INFORMATION; BUSINESS; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1002/csr.2288
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Green innovation is a key way for firms to establish competitive advantage and contribute to sustainable development, but it often suffers from financing constraints. In this regard, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices allow firms to have a wider investor base, face lower risk, and generate positive market reactions, ultimately leading to a lower cost of capital, which may potentially alleviate financing constraints and provide strong motivation for green innovation. Combining stakeholder theory with the resource-based view (RBV), this study investigated how ESG substantially affects corporate green innovation. Based on a zero-inflated Poisson regression analysis of 1577 listed Chinese manufacturing firms, we found that better ESG could significantly induce better corporate green innovation, and financing constraints acted as a mediator in the relationship between ESG and green innovation. Our findings contribute to a more detailed understanding of the mechanisms by which corporate pro-social decision-makings initiate and boost green innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:1513 / 1526
页数:14
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]   Sustainability-oriented Innovation: A Systematic Review [J].
Adams, Richard ;
Jeanrenaud, Sally ;
Bessant, John ;
Denyer, David ;
Overy, Patrick .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2016, 18 (02) :180-205
[2]   Corporate Green Bonds: Understanding the Greenium in a Two-Factor Structural Model [J].
Agliardi, Elettra ;
Agliardi, Rossella .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2021, 80 (02) :257-278
[3]   A relational natural-resource-based view on product innovation: The influence of green product innovation and green suppliers on differentiation advantage in small manufacturing firms [J].
Andersen, Jim .
TECHNOVATION, 2021, 104 (104)
[4]   ANOTHER LOOK AT THE INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ESTIMATION OF ERROR-COMPONENTS MODELS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOVER, O .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1995, 68 (01) :29-51
[5]   Corporate ESG reporting quantity, quality and performance: Where to now for environmental policy and practice? [J].
Arvidsson, Susanne ;
Dumay, John .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 31 (03) :1091-1110
[6]   ESG and stock price crash risk: role of financial constraints* [J].
Bae, JinCheol ;
Yang, Xiaotong ;
Kim, Myung-In .
ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2021, 50 (05) :556-581
[7]   Why resource-based theory's model of profit appropriation must incorporate a stakeholder perspective [J].
Barney, Jay B. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2018, 39 (13) :3305-3325
[8]   Commitment Strategies for Sustainability: How Business Firms Can Transform Trade-Offs Into Win-Win Outcomes [J].
Beckmann, Markus ;
Hielscher, Stefan ;
Pies, Ingo .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 23 (01) :18-37
[9]   Administrative environmental innovations, supply network structure, and environmental disclosure [J].
Bellamy, Marcus A. ;
Dhanorkar, Suvrat ;
Subramanian, Ravi .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2020, 66 (7-8) :895-932
[10]   Individual and Corporate Social Responsibility [J].
Benabou, Roland ;
Tirole, Jean .
ECONOMICA, 2010, 77 (305) :1-19