A comparison of learning outcomes and attitudes in student- versus faculty-led problem-based learning: an experimental study

被引:66
作者
Steele, DJ
Medder, JD
Turner, P
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Med Ctr, Dept Family Med, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
[2] Creighton Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Omaha, NE USA
关键词
attitude of health personnel; curriculum; education; medical; undergraduate; methods; outcome assessment; health care; problem-based learning;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00460.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Objectives To compare learning outcomes and perceptions of facilitator behaviours and small-group process in problem-based learning (PBL) groups led by students and those led by faculty. Design A prospective, Latin-square cross-over design was employed. Second-year medical students participated in 11 PBL cases over the course of the academic year. For each case, half the student groups were led by faculty and the other half by a student group member selected randomly to serve in the facilitator role. Learning outcomes were assessed by performance on objective examinations covering factual materials pertinent to the case. Perceptions of facilitator behaviours and of group functioning were assessed with a questionnaire completed at the end of each individual case. Focus-group discussions were held to gain more in-depth information about student perceptions and experience. Student-led sessions were observed at random by the investigators. Setting A state-supported, US medical school with a hybrid lecture-based and problem-based curriculum. Subjects One hundred and twenty-seven second-year medical students and 30 basic science and clinical faculty. Results No differences were detected in student performance on the objective evaluation based on whether the facilitator was a faculty member or peer group member, nor were there any differences in the perceptions of group process. Students gave peer facilitators slightly higher ratings in the second semester of the experiment. In the focus-group discussions, students voiced a general preference for student-led groups because they felt they were more efficient. Observation and focus-group reports suggest that groups led by students sometimes took short cuts in the PBL process. Conclusion In a hybrid lecture- and PBL-based curriculum, student performance on objective examinations covering PBL materials is unaffected by the status of the facilitator (student vs. faculty). However, in peer-facilitated groups, students sometimes took short cuts in the PBL process that may undermine some of the intended goals of PBL.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 29
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   EFFECTS OF EXPERT AND NONEXPERT FACILITATORS ON THE SMALL-GROUP PROCESS AND ON STUDENT PERFORMANCE [J].
DAVIS, WK ;
NAIRN, R ;
PAINE, ME ;
ANDERSON, RM ;
OH, MS .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1992, 67 (07) :470-474
[2]  
DEGRAVE WS, 1990, INNOVATION MED ED EV
[3]   PEER TEACHING - ACADEMIC-ACHIEVEMENT OF TEACHER-LED VERSUS STUDENT-LED DISCUSSION GROUPS [J].
DEVOLDER, ML ;
DEGRAVE, WS ;
GIJSELAERS, WIM .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 1985, 14 (06) :643-650
[4]   EFFECTS OF TUTORS WITH CASE EXPERTISE ON PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING ISSUES [J].
EAGLE, CJ ;
HARASYM, PH ;
MANDIN, H .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1992, 67 (07) :465-469
[5]   Cognitive consequences of problem-based learning for the early development of medical expertise [J].
Hmelo, CE .
TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 1998, 10 (02) :92-100
[6]   Tutoring in problem-based learning: Perceptions of teachers and students [J].
Kaufman, DM ;
Holmes, DB .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1996, 30 (05) :371-377
[7]  
MAYO P, 1993, TEACH LEARN MED, V4, P227
[8]   PEER TEACHING AND HIGHER LEVEL COGNITIVE-LEARNING OUTCOMES IN PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING [J].
MOUST, JHC ;
DEVOLDER, ML ;
NUY, HJP .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 1989, 18 (06) :737-742
[9]  
MUELLER S, 1984, PHYSICIANS 21 CENTUR
[10]   INFLUENCE OF TUTORS SUBJECT-MATTER EXPERTISE ON STUDENT EFFORT AND ACHIEVEMENT IN PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING [J].
SCHMIDT, HG ;
VANDERAREND, A ;
MOUST, JHC ;
KOKX, I ;
BOON, L .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1993, 68 (10) :784-791