Longitudinal Growth Trajectories of Written Syntactic Complexity: The Case of Turkish Learners in an Intensive English Program

被引:23
作者
Polat, Nihat [1 ]
Mahalingappa, Laura [1 ]
Mancilla, Rae L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Duquesne Univ, Sch Educ, 106C Canevin Hall,600 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15282 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Instruct Designer, Univ Ctr Teaching & Learning, 820 Alumni Hall,4227 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
TASK COMPLEXITY; ACCURACY; FLUENCY; WRITERS; EMERGENCE; PATTERNS; CAF; 2ND;
D O I
10.1093/applin/amz034
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This longitudinal study examined growth patterns of written syntactic complexity of Turkish learners of English. Using a nonexperimental corpus of 852 writing samples by 284 English as a foreign language (EFL) learners over three semesters, the study addressed the following questions: which indices of syntactic complexity characterize the writing of EFL learners most saliently at elementary, pre-intermediate, and intermediate levels? How do levels of the indices of syntactic complexity change over time as learners progress fromelementary to pre-intermediate and intermediate levels? Results suggested that lower proficiency level (levels 1 and 2) writers produced similar patterns of written syntactic complexity (reliance on phrasal coordination), while at proficiency level 3, they demonstrated constructions that were more complex and of greater variety. Findings revealed that over time, learners experienced significant syntactic changes in multiple aspects of complexity; however, these changes were not necessarily straightforward or incremental across the three levels. These findings underscore issues of unpredictability and linearity in second language acquisition, while also cautioning us about the role of intensity of classroom instruction in L2 development.
引用
收藏
页码:688 / 711
页数:24
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Ai H., 2013, Automatic treatment and analysis of learner corpus data, P249, DOI DOI 10.1075/SCL.59.15AI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, A dynamic approach to second language development
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Halliday's Introduction to Functional Grammar: Fourth Edition, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203431269
[4]   A 2ND LOOK AT T-UNIT ANALYSIS - RECONSIDERING THE SENTENCE [J].
BARDOVIHARLIG, K .
TESOL QUARTERLY, 1992, 26 (02) :390-395
[5]  
Bulte B., 2012, Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA, P21, DOI DOI 10.1075/LLLT.32.02BUL
[6]   Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity [J].
Bulte, Bram ;
Housen, Alex .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2014, 26 :42-65
[7]  
Byrnes H., 2010, The Modern Language Journal, V94, P1
[8]   MEASURING WRITTEN SYNTACTIC PATTERNS OF 2ND LANGUAGE LEARNERS OF GERMAN [J].
COOPER, TC .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1976, 69 (05) :176-183
[9]   Does writing development equal writing quality? A computational investigation of syntactic complexity in L2 learners [J].
Crossley, Scott A. ;
McNamara, Danielle S. .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2014, 26 :66-79
[10]   Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics - Introduction to the special issue [J].
Ellis, Nick C. ;
Larsen-Freeman, Diane .
APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2006, 27 (04) :558-589