Non-inferiority and equivalence trials: Key methodological issues

被引:1
作者
Herr, M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Descatha, A. [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
Aegerter, P. [2 ,3 ,4 ,7 ]
机构
[1] INSERM, U1168, Vieillissement & Malad Chron Approches Epidemiol, F-94800 Villejuif, France
[2] Univ Versailles St Quentin En Yvelines, UMR S 1168, F-78180 Montigny Le Bretonneux, France
[3] Hop Univ Paris Ile de France Ouest, AP HP, Dept Hosp Epidemiol & Sante Publ, Site Ambroise Pare, F-92100 Boulogne, France
[4] Hop Univ Paris Ile de France Ouest, AP HP, Dept Hosp Epidemiol & Sante Publ, Site St Perine, F-75016 Paris, France
[5] INSERM, Cohortes Epidemiol Populat, UMS011, F-94800 Villejuif, France
[6] Hop Univ Paris Ile de France Ouest, AP HP, Unite Hosp Univ Sante Profess, Site Raymond Poincare, F-92380 Garches, France
[7] Hop Univ Paris Ile de France Ouest, AP HP, Unite Rech Clin, Site Ambroise Pare, F-92100 Boulogne, France
来源
REVUE DE MEDECINE INTERNE | 2018年 / 39卷 / 05期
关键词
Clinical trials; Non-inferiority; Equivalence; Methodology; DOUBLE-BLIND; NONINFERIORITY; MONOTHERAPY; EFFICACY; ETHICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.revmed.2017.06.010
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Non-inferiority and equivalence trials aim to promote new treatments that are not expected to be superior to existing ones in a given indication. In order to compensate for a possible loss of efficacy, the new treatment should offer other advantages compared to the reference treatment, a better safety of use for example. Their methods somewhat differ from those of superiority trials, often better known to the medical community. This article presents the key points of the methodology of non-inferiority and equivalence trials in order to inform the readers of such trials about the issues and critical points. The general methodology (hypotheses, decision rules, number of subjects required, and strategy of analysis) is presented using examples and graphic illustrations. The issues and critical points are identified and discussed, in particular the choice of the comparator and of the margin of non-inferiority. (C) 2017 Societe Nationale Francaise de Medecine Interne (SNFMI). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:352 / 359
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, CPMPEWPQWP140198 EUR
[3]  
[Anonymous], ICH HARM TRIP GUID S
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, BMJ BRIT MED J, DOI DOI 10.1136/BMJ.F6853
[5]  
[Anonymous], BMJ BRIT MED J
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, ICH HARM TRIP GUID G
[7]   Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of lacosamide monotherapy versus controlled-release carbamazepine in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy: a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial [J].
Baulac, Michel ;
Rosenow, Felix ;
Toledo, Manuel ;
Terada, Kiyohito ;
Li, Ting ;
De Backer, Marc ;
Werhahn, Konrad ;
Brock, Melissa .
LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2017, 16 (01) :43-54
[8]   Antibiotic treatment for 6 weeks versus 12 weeks in patients with pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled trial [J].
Bernard, Louis ;
Dinh, Aurelien ;
Ghout, Idir ;
Simo, David ;
Zeller, Valerie ;
Issartel, Bertrand ;
Le Moing, Vincent ;
Belmatoug, Nadia ;
Lesprit, Philippe ;
Bru, Jean-Pierre ;
Therby, Audrey ;
Bouhour, Damien ;
Denes, Eric ;
Debard, Alexa ;
Chirouze, Catherine ;
Fevre, Karine ;
Dupon, Michel ;
Aegerter, Philippe ;
Mulleman, Denis .
LANCET, 2015, 385 (9971) :875-882
[9]   Short-course oral co-trimoxazole versus intramuscular benzathine benzylpenicillin for impetigo in a highly endemic region: an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial [J].
Bowen, Asha C. ;
Tong, Steven Y. C. ;
Andrews, Ross M. ;
O'Meara, Irene M. ;
McDonald, Malcolm I. ;
Chatfield, Mark D. ;
Currie, Bart J. ;
Carapetis, Jonathan R. .
LANCET, 2014, 384 (9960) :2132-2140
[10]   Methodology of superiority vs. equivalence trials and non-inferiority trials [J].
Christensen, Erik .
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2007, 46 (05) :947-954