Efficacy of a modern neuroscience approach versus usual care evidence-based physiotherapy on pain, disability and brain characteristics in chronic spinal pain patients: protocol of a randomized clinical trial

被引:34
作者
Dolphens, Mieke [1 ]
Nijs, Jo [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Cagnie, Barbara [1 ]
Meeus, Mira [1 ,5 ]
Roussel, Nathalie [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Kregel, Jeroen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Malfliet, Anneleen [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Vanderstraeten, Guy [1 ,6 ]
Danneels, Lieven [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Rehabil Sci & Physiotherapy, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Vrije Univ Brussels, Dept Human Physiol, Pain Mot Res Grp, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Vrije Univ Brussels, Dept Physiotherapy, Fac Phys Educ & Physiotherapy, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Univ Hosp Brussels, Dept Phys Med & Physiotherapy, Brussels, Belgium
[5] Univ Antwerp, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Pain Mot Res Grp, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium
[6] Univ Ghent, Dept Phys & Rehabil Med, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Chronic pain; Low back pain; Neck pain; Education; Exercise; Motor control; Neuroscience; Randomized controlled trial; LOW-BACK-PAIN; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; NECK PAIN; CENTRAL SENSITIZATION; MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN; ILLNESS PERCEPTIONS; CATASTROPHIZING SCALE; SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS; CHRONIC WHIPLASH; GLOBAL BURDEN;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2474-15-149
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Among the multiple conservative modalities, physiotherapy is a commonly utilized treatment modality in managing chronic non-specific spinal pain. Despite the scientific progresses with regard to pain and motor control neuroscience, treatment of chronic spinal pain (CSP) often tends to stick to a peripheral biomechanical model, without targeting brain mechanisms. With a view to enhance clinical efficacy of existing physiotherapeutic treatments for CSP, the development of clinical strategies targeted at 'training the brain' is to be pursued. Promising proof-of-principle results have been reported for the effectiveness of a modern neuroscience approach to CSP when compared to usual care, but confirmation is required in a larger, multi-center trial with appropriate evidence-based control intervention and long-term follow-up. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of a modern neuroscience approach, compared to usual care evidence-based physiotherapy, for reducing pain and improving functioning in patients with CSP. A secondary objective entails examining the effectiveness of the modern neuroscience approach versus usual care physiotherapy for normalizing brain gray matter in patients with CSP. Methods/Design: The study is a multi-center, triple-blind, two-arm (1: 1) randomized clinical trial with 1-year follow-up. 120 CSP patients will be randomly allocated to either the experimental (receiving pain neuroscience education followed by cognition-targeted motor control training) or the control group (receiving usual care physiotherapy), each comprising of 3 months treatment. The main outcome measures are pain (including symptoms and indices of central sensitization) and self-reported disability. Secondary outcome measures include brain gray matter structure, motor control, muscle properties, and psychosocial correlates. Clinical assessment and brain imaging will be performed at baseline, post-treatment and at 1-year follow-up. Web-based questionnaires will be completed at baseline, after the first 3 treatment sessions, post-treatment, and at 6 and 12-months follow-up. Discussion: Findings may provide empirical evidence on: (1) the effectiveness of a modern neuroscience approach to CSP for reducing pain and improving functioning, (2) the effectiveness of a modern neuroscience approach for normalizing brain gray matter in CSP patients, and (3) factors associated with therapy success. Hence, this trial might contribute towards refining guidelines for good clinical practice and might be used as a basis for health authorities' recommendations.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]   Chapter 4 - European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain [J].
Airaksinen, O. ;
Brox, J. I. ;
Cedraschi, C. ;
Hildebrandt, J. ;
Klaber-Moffett, J. ;
Kovacs, F. ;
Mannion, A. F. ;
Reis, S. ;
Staal, J. B. ;
Ursin, H. ;
Zanoli, G. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2006, 15 (Suppl 2) :S192-S300
[2]   Low back pain symptoms show a similar pattern of improvement following a wide range of primary care treatments: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials [J].
Artus, Majid ;
van der Windt, Danielle A. ;
Jordan, Kelvin P. ;
Hay, Elaine M. .
RHEUMATOLOGY, 2010, 49 (12) :2346-2356
[3]   Non-specific low back pain [J].
Balague, Federico ;
Mannion, Anne F. ;
Pellise, Ferran ;
Cedraschi, Christine .
LANCET, 2012, 379 (9814) :482-491
[4]   PHYSICAL MEASUREMENTS AS RISK INDICATORS FOR LOW-BACK TROUBLE OVER A ONE-YEAR PERIOD [J].
BIERINGSORENSEN, F .
SPINE, 1984, 9 (02) :106-119
[5]   White Matter Hyperintensity Burden and Disability in Older Adults: Is Chronic Pain a Contributor? [J].
Buckalew, Neilly ;
Haut, Marc W. ;
Aizenstein, Howard ;
Rosano, Caterina ;
Edelman, Kathryn Dunfee ;
Perera, Subashan ;
Marrow, Lisa ;
Tadic, Stasa ;
Venkatraman, Vijay ;
Weiner, Debra .
PM&R, 2013, 5 (06) :471-480
[6]  
Butler D., 2003, EXPLAIN PAIN, V1
[7]   Reliability of temporal summation and diffuse noxious inhibitory control [J].
Cathcart, Stuart ;
Winefield, Anthony H. ;
Rolan, Paul ;
Lushington, Kurt .
PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 2009, 14 (06) :433-438
[8]   Neck pain: Clinical practice guidelines linked to the international classification of functioning, disability, and health from the orthopaedic section of the American physical therapy association [J].
Childs, John D. ;
Cleland, Joshua A. ;
Elliott, James M. ;
Teyhen, Deydre S. ;
Wainner, Robert S. ;
Whitman, Julie M. ;
Sopky, Bernard J. ;
Godges, Joseph J. ;
Flynn, Timothy W. .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2008, 38 (09) :A1-A34
[9]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, VSecond
[10]   Functional stability re-training: principles and strategies for managing mechanical dysfunction [J].
Comerford, MJ ;
Mottram, SL .
MANUAL THERAPY, 2001, 6 (01) :3-14