Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the short food literacy questionnaire among university students

被引:16
作者
Durmus, Hasan [1 ]
Gokler, Mehmet Enes [2 ]
Havlioglu, Suzan [3 ]
机构
[1] Kilis Local Hlth Author, Kilis, Turkey
[2] Ankara Yildirim Beyazit Univ, Fac Med, Publ Hlth Dept, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Hasan Kalyoncu Univ, Dept Nursing, Gaziantep, Turkey
来源
PROGRESS IN NUTRITION | 2019年 / 21卷 / 02期
关键词
food literacy; validation; health literacy; nutrition; HEALTH LITERACY; NUTRITION; ADOLESCENTS;
D O I
10.23751/pn.v21i2.7094
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was translating and adapting the SFLQ to Turkish and evaluating the validity and reliability for adults in Turkey. In accordance with the purpose of the study, a 2-part questionnaire was prepared. The first part focused on the sociodemographic characteristics, including age, sex, and questions that determine food label reading habits. The second part consisted of the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) test, Turkey Health Literacy SCALE-32 (TSOY-32) and Short Food Literacy Questionnaire (SFLQ). The construct validity of the SLFQ was assessed using factor analysis. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy was 0.811. Bartlett's test of sphericity was significant (X2=841.958, df=66; p<0.001). A Scree plot and eigenvalues determined that one factor should be retained, which accounted for 32.01% of the variance. The questionnaire factor loadings varied between 0.43 and 0.64. Internal consistency was assessed by calculating Cronbach alfa, and the value was 0.803. There was a positive relationship between SLFQ, TSOY-32 and NVS (r=0.531, p<0.001; r=0.294, p<0.001). As a results of this study, it can be said that SLFQ is a valid and reliable measurement tool, therefore it can be used to describing food literacy among Turkish adults.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 338
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
am M.O., 2010, J. Res. Dev. Nurs, V12, P59
[2]   The Ontario Food and Nutrition Strategy: identifying indicators of food access and food literacy for early monitoring of the food environment [J].
Boucher, Beatrice A. ;
Manafo, Elizabeth ;
Boddy, Meaghan R. ;
Roblin, Lynn ;
Truscott, Rebecca .
HEALTH PROMOTION AND CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION IN CANADA-RESEARCH POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2017, 37 (09) :313-319
[3]   Adolescent food literacy programmes: A review of the literature [J].
Brooks, Natalie ;
Begley, Andrea .
NUTRITION & DIETETICS, 2014, 71 (03) :158-171
[4]  
Bublitz M.G., 2011, Journal of Research for Consumers, V19, P1
[5]  
Buyukozturk S., 2004, VERI ANALIZI KITABI, V4
[6]   Nutrition and Health Literacy: A Systematic Review to Inform Nutrition Research and Practice [J].
Carbone, Elena T. ;
Zoellner, Jamie M. .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2012, 112 (02) :254-265
[7]  
Colatruglio S., 2014, Sustainable well-being: Concepts, issues, and educational practices, P37
[8]   Food Literacy: Definition and Framework for Action [J].
Cullen, Tracy ;
Hatch, Janelle ;
Martin, Wanda ;
Higgins, Joan Wharf ;
Sheppard, Rosanna .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF DIETETIC PRACTICE AND RESEARCH, 2015, 76 (03) :140-145
[9]  
Erefe I., 2004, NURSING RES PRINCIPL
[10]  
Ferris L, 1992, TOOLS PRIMARY CARE R, p64Y76