Phylogeny of Litsea and related genera (Laureae-Lauraceae) based on analysis of rpb2 gene sequences

被引:35
作者
Fijridiyanto, Izu A. [1 ,2 ]
Murakami, Noriaki [3 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Sci, Dept Bot, Sakyo Ku, Kyoto 606850, Japan
[2] Indonesian Inst Sci, Ctr Plant Conservat Bogor Bot Gardens, Bogor 16003, West Java, Indonesia
[3] Tokyo Metropolitan Univ, Makino Herbarium, Tokyo 1920397, Japan
关键词
Litsea; Molecular phylogeny; rpb2; RNA-POLYMERASE-II; NUCLEAR-DNA; EVOLUTION; CHLOROPLAST; MATK; CLASSIFICATION; RECONSTRUCTION; DUPLICATION; SUBUNIT; COMPLEX;
D O I
10.1007/s10265-009-0218-8
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The relationship between Litsea and related genera is currently unclear. Previous molecular studies on these taxa using cpDNA and nrITS were unable to produce well-resolved phylogenetic trees. In this study, we explored the potential of the rpb2 gene as a source of molecular information to better resolve the phylogenetic analysis. Although rpb2 was believed to be a single-copy gene, our cloning results showed that most species examined possessed several copies of these sequences. However, the genetic distance among copies from any one species was low, and these copies always formed monophyletic groups in our molecular trees. Our phylogenetic analyses of rpb2 data resulted in better resolved tree topologies compared to those based on cpDNA or nrITS data. Our results show that monophyly of the genus Litsea is supported only for section Litsea. As a genus, Litsea was shown to be polyphyletic. The genera Actinodaphne and Neolitsea were resolved as monophyletic groups in all analyses. They were also shown to be sisters and closer to the genus Lindera than to the genus Litsea. Our results also revealed that the genus Lindera is not a monophyletic group.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 298
页数:16
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs [J].
Altschul, SF ;
Madden, TL ;
Schaffer, AA ;
Zhang, JH ;
Zhang, Z ;
Miller, W ;
Lipman, DJ .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1997, 25 (17) :3389-3402
[2]   Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference [J].
Alvarez, I ;
Wendel, JF .
MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION, 2003, 29 (03) :417-434
[3]  
Bentham G., 1880, GENERA PLANTARUM, VVolume 3, P146
[4]   Direct amplification of the entire ITS region from poorly preserved plant material using recombinant PCR [J].
Blattner, FR .
BIOTECHNIQUES, 1999, 27 (06) :1180-+
[5]   Contribution of Taq polymerase-induced errors to the estimation of RNA virus diversity [J].
Bracho, MA ;
Moya, A ;
Barrio, E .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY, 1998, 79 :2921-2928
[6]   Phylogeny and historical biogeography of Lauraceae: Evidence from the chloroplast and nuclear genomes [J].
Chanderbali, AS ;
van der Werff, H ;
Renner, SS .
ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN, 2001, 88 (01) :104-134
[7]   When does the incongruence length difference test fail? [J].
Darlu, P ;
Lecointre, G .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2002, 19 (04) :432-437
[8]   Usefulness of RNA polymerase II coding sequences for estimation of green plant phylogeny [J].
Denton, AL ;
McConaughy, BL ;
Hall, BD .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 1998, 15 (08) :1082-1085
[9]   Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining [J].
Farris, JS ;
Albert, VA ;
Kallersjo, M ;
Lipscomb, D ;
Kluge, AG .
CLADISTICS, 1996, 12 (02) :99-124
[10]  
FELSENSTEIN J, 1985, EVOLUTION, V39, P783, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x