Comparing classification methods for diffuse reflectance spectra to improve tissue specific laser surgery

被引:10
作者
Engelhardt, Alexander [1 ]
Kanawade, Rajesh [4 ]
Knipfer, Christian [2 ]
Schmid, Matthias [3 ]
Stelzle, Florian [2 ]
Adler, Werner [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Med Informat Biometry & Epidemiol, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Erlangen Univ Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[3] Univ Bonn, Dept Med Biometry Informat & Epidemiol, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
[4] SAOT Grad Sch Adv Opt Technol, D-91052 Erlangen, Germany
关键词
Laser surgery; Reflectance spectroscopy; Machine learning; Penalized discriminant analysis; AUTOFLUORESCENCE; SPECTROSCOPY; DIFFERENTIATION;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2288-14-91
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery, newly developed laser scalpels have multiple advantages over traditional metal scalpels. However, they lack haptic feedback. This is dangerous near e. g. nerve tissue, which has to be preserved during surgery. One solution to this problem is to train an algorithm that analyzes the reflected light spectra during surgery and can classify these spectra into different tissue types, in order to ultimately send a warning or temporarily switch off the laser when critical tissue is about to be ablated. Various machine learning algorithms are available for this task, but a detailed analysis is needed to assess the most appropriate algorithm. Methods: In this study, a small data set is used to simulate many larger data sets according to a multivariate Gaussian distribution. Various machine learning algorithms are then trained and evaluated on these data sets. The algorithms' performance is subsequently evaluated and compared by averaged confusion matrices and ultimately by boxplots of misclassification rates. The results are validated on the smaller, experimental data set. Results: Most classifiers have a median misclassification rate below 0.25 in the simulated data. The most notable performance was observed for the Penalized Discriminant Analysis, with a misclassifiaction rate of 0.00 in the simulated data, and an average misclassification rate of 0.02 in a 10-fold cross validation on the original data. Conclusion: The results suggest a Penalized Discriminant Analysis is the most promising approach, most probably because it considers the functional, correlated nature of the reflectance spectra. The results of this study improve the accuracy of real-time tissue discrimination and are an essential step towards improving the safety of oral laser surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[2]   Autofluorescence and diffuse reflectance properties of malignant and benign breast tissues [J].
Breslin, TM ;
Xu, FS ;
Palmer, GM ;
Zhu, CF ;
Gilchrist, KW ;
Ramanujam, N .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 11 (01) :65-70
[3]   Autofluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for oral oncology [J].
de Veld, DCG ;
Skurichina, M ;
Wities, MJH ;
Duin, RPW ;
Sterenborg, HJCM ;
Roodenburg, JLN .
LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE, 2005, 36 (05) :356-364
[4]   LIMITATIONS OF CANCER MARGIN DELINEATION BY MEANS OF AUTOFLUORESCENCE IMAGING UNDER CONDITIONS OF LASER SURGERY [J].
Douplik, Alexandre ;
Zam, Azhar ;
Hohenstein, Ralph ;
Kalitzeos, Angelos ;
Nkenke, Emeka ;
Stelzle, Florian .
JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE OPTICAL HEALTH SCIENCES, 2010, 3 (01) :45-51
[6]   An introduction to ROC analysis [J].
Fawcett, Tom .
PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2006, 27 (08) :861-874
[7]  
Friedman J. H., 1975, IEEE Transactions on Computers, VC-24, P1000, DOI 10.1109/T-C.1975.224110
[8]   REGULARIZED DISCRIMINANT-ANALYSIS [J].
FRIEDMAN, JH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1989, 84 (405) :165-175
[9]   PENALIZED DISCRIMINANT-ANALYSIS [J].
HASTIE, T ;
BUJA, A ;
TIBSHIRANI, R .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1995, 23 (01) :73-102
[10]  
Hastie T., 2009, ELEMENTS STAT LEARNI, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7