Forming Interoperability Through Interorganizational Systems Standards

被引:35
作者
Zhao, Kexin [1 ]
Xia, Mu [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Belk Coll Business, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[2] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Key Lab Financial Intelligence & Financial Engn, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
business value; geospatial industry; interoperability; interorganizational systems standards; IT standards; network effects; standardization; standardized data infrastructure; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; E-BUSINESS; NETWORK EXTERNALITIES; MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; BEHAVIORAL-RESEARCH; METHOD VARIANCE; EDI USAGE; ADOPTION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.2753/MIS0742-1222300410
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Interoperability is a crucial organizational capability that enables firms to manage information systems (IS) from heterogeneous trading partners in a value network. While interoperability has been discussed conceptually in the IS literature, few comprehensive empirical studies have been conducted to conceptualize this construct and examine it in depth. For instance, it is unclear how interoperability is formed and whether it can improve organizational performance. To fill the gap, we argue that interorganizational systems (IOS) standards are a key information technology infrastructure facilitating formation of interoperability. As an organizational ability to work with external trading partners, interoperability's development depends not only on capability building within firm boundaries but also on community readiness across firm boundaries. Using data collected from 194 organizations in the geospatial industry, we empirically confirm that interoperability is formed via these two different paths. Furthermore, our results show that interoperability acts as a mediator by enabling firms to achieve performance gains from IOS standards adoption. Our study sheds new light on formation mechanisms as well as the business value of interoperability.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 298
页数:30
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1972, P AM PHILOS SOC
[2]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[3]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[4]   Indirect network externality effects on product attributes [J].
Basu, A ;
Mazumdar, T ;
Raj, SP .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2003, 22 (02) :209-221
[5]   Types of information technology capabilities and their role in competitive advantage: An empirical study [J].
Bhatt, GD ;
Grover, V .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2005, 22 (02) :253-277
[6]   CONVENTIONAL WISDOM ON MEASUREMENT - A STRUCTURAL EQUATION PERSPECTIVE [J].
BOLLEN, K ;
LENNOX, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1991, 110 (02) :305-314
[7]   The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations [J].
Brown, SL ;
Eisenhardt, KM .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1997, 42 (01) :1-34
[8]   Factors affecting the adoption and diffusion of XML and Web services standards for E-business systems [J].
Chen, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2003, 58 (03) :259-279
[9]  
Chen R., 2008, J ASSOC INF SYST, V9, P7
[10]  
Chin W. W., 1998, MIS Q, V22, P1