Forest fire susceptibility mapping via multi-criteria decision analysis techniques for Mugla, Turkey: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS

被引:98
作者
Sari, Fatih [1 ]
机构
[1] Selcuk Univ, Engn Fac, Geomat Engn Dept, Konya, Turkey
关键词
Forest fire susceptibility mapping; Multi criteria decision analysis; AHP; TOPSIS; VIKOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118644
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Turkey has a high forest fire potential along the Aegean and Mediterranean coasts, related to climate and extremely sensitive forests. In Turkey over 10,000-ha forest area has been destroyed every year and inevitable damage has been revealed. Forest fires not only destroy forest areas, but also cause damage to ecosystems, habitats and especially human lives. Because Mugla province has 90% of total pine honey production in the world and a high potential forest fire occurrence rate, sustainability of ecosystems, productivity and economic income require determining forest fire susceptibility zones. Generating forest fire susceptibility zones is a complex study which requires considering environmental, forestry, topographic, economic, and meteorological parameters within a decision support platform. At this point, Geographical Information System (GIS) aided Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) techniques can provide sufficient and effective solutions for fire susceptibility mapping due to the comparable and scalable structure of the criteria that are used to determine the susceptibility map when deciding. In this study, the weight of each criterion is calculated via the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Then, TOPSIS and VIKOR methods were used to generate forest fire susceptibility maps in Mugla province. The results indicated that 1659.44 ha (13%) and 3952.14 ha (31%) of the study area were assigned as highly prone to forest fire according to the TOPSIS and VIKOR calculations respectively, and an 81% correlation coefficient was calculated between methods. The reliabilities of the maps were verified with 1454 forest fire locations. Considering the respective 89.54%, 86.94% and 88.99% accuracy rate of VIKOR, TOPSIS and AHP susceptibility maps, all the methods could be used in forest fire susceptibility map generation which has comprehensive decision making process.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessment of data mining, multi-criteria decision making and fuzzy-computing techniques for spatial flood susceptibility mapping: a comparative study
    Balogun, Abdul-Lateef
    Sheng, Tan Yong
    Sallehuddin, Muhammad Helmy
    Aina, Yusuf A.
    Dano, Umar Lawal
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Yekeen, Shamsudeen
    Tella, Abdulwaheed
    GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (26) : 12989 - 13015
  • [42] Mapping Greater Bandung flood susceptibility based on multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) using AHP method
    Agustina, Rena Denya
    Putra, Riki Purnama
    Susanti, Seni
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2023, 82 (15)
  • [43] Harnessing Ecosystem Models and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the Support of Forest Management
    Wolfslehner, Bernhard
    Seidl, Rupert
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 46 (06) : 850 - 861
  • [44] Harnessing Ecosystem Models and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the Support of Forest Management
    Bernhard Wolfslehner
    Rupert Seidl
    Environmental Management, 2010, 46 : 850 - 861
  • [45] India's flood risk assessment and mapping with multi-criteria decision analysis and GIS integration
    Kumar, Vijendra
    Solanki, Yash Parshottambhai
    Sharma, Kul Vaibhav
    Patel, Anant
    Tiwari, Deepak Kumar
    Mehta, Darshan J.
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2024, : 5721 - 5740
  • [46] Multi-criteria Decision Analysis for Desired Contaminated Groundwater Remediation Strategies based on TOPSIS method
    Shao, F.
    Ren, L. X.
    Liu, L.
    Lu, H. W.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2015, 2015, 31 : 881 - 884
  • [47] Analysis of the performance of assessment scales with multi-criteria decision-making techniques
    Demir, Alparslan Serhat
    Yazici, Esra
    Ogur, Yavuz Selim
    Yazici, Ahmet Bulent
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2023, 11 (03): : 192 - 197
  • [48] Unweighted TOPSIS: a new multi-criteria tool for sustainability analysis
    Benitez, Rafael
    Liern, Vicente
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (01) : 36 - 48
  • [49] Decerns: A Framework for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Boris Yatsalo
    Vladimir Didenko
    Sergey Gritsyuk
    Terry Sullivan
    International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2015, 8 : 467 - 489
  • [50] A comparison of the AHP and TOPSIS multi-criteria decision-making tools for prioritizing sub-watersheds using morphometric parameters' analysis
    Kumar, Pankaj
    Sarkar, Purabi
    MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 8 (03) : 3973 - 3983