Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET-CT in triaging lung cancer patients with suspected brain metastases for MRI

被引:12
|
作者
Hjorthaug, Karin [1 ,2 ]
Hojbjerg, Johanne A. [3 ,4 ]
Knap, Marianne M. [4 ]
Tietze, Anna [5 ]
Haraldsen, Ate [1 ,2 ]
Zacho, Helle D. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Kramer, Stine M. J. [1 ,2 ]
Borghammer, Per [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Noerrebrogade 44,Bygn 10G, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, PET Ctr, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Biochem, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[4] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[5] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Neuroradiol, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[6] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
brain metastases; F-18-FDG PET/CT; lung cancer; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; FDG-PET; CEREBRAL METASTASES;
D O I
10.1097/MNM.0000000000000371
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective Brain metastases are common in lung cancer. Whole-body 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18] fluoro-D-glucose ([F-18] FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT) is used for general staging, but MRI is the best modality for characterizing brain abnormalities. We aimed to determine whether PET/CT is suitable for selecting patients for MRI on the suspicion of brain metastases. Materials and methods F-18-FDG PET/CT (from the vertex to mid-thigh) was performed in 1108 consecutive patients suspected of lung cancer. The final diagnoses were extracted from medical records as lung cancer, with or without brain metastases, other kinds of cancers, or no cancer. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value for detecting brain metastases were calculated. Interobserver variation was tested in a subset of 88 PET/CT scans. Results Of the 1108 referred patients, 596 had lung cancer. Sixty-six had brain metastases. One PET/CT was false positive. Thirty-one scans were true positive among the 43 patients who were diagnosed with brain metastases 1 month before to 3 months after PET/CT (metastasis prevalence, 7.3%). Twelve PET/CT scans were false negative. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values were 72, 100, and 97%, respectively. Interobserver agreement between two experienced observers was high (kappa = 0.83), whereas agreement between the experienced and the inexperienced observer was poor. Conclusion The sensitivity of brain PET/CT for detecting brain metastases in lung cancer was above 70%, and the specificity was very high. Thus, PET/CT may be suitable for selecting patients for MRI in diagnostic centers that do not perform routine MRI in the pretherapeutic staging workup. The agreement among experienced readers was very high. Copyright (C) 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1084 / 1090
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] 18F-FDG PET/CT for Response Assessment in Lung Cancer
    Marcus, Charles
    Tajmir, Shahein H.
    Rowe, Steven P.
    Sheikhbahaei, Sara
    Solnes, Lilja B.
    SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2022, 52 (06) : 662 - 672
  • [32] 18F-FDG PET-CT scanning and diabetic patients: what to do?
    Martin, Jon
    Saleem, Nayyar
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2014, 35 (12) : 1197 - 1203
  • [33] The usefulness of 18F-FDG PET/MRI fusion image in diagnosing pancreatic tumor: comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT
    Nagamachi, Shigeki
    Nishii, Ryuichi
    Wakamatsu, Hideyuki
    Mizutani, Youichi
    Kiyohara, Shogo
    Fujita, Seigo
    Futami, Shigemi
    Sakae, Tatefumi
    Furukoji, Eiji
    Tamura, Shozo
    Arita, Hideo
    Chijiiwa, Kazuo
    Kawai, Keiichi
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2013, 27 (06) : 554 - 563
  • [34] Does 18F-FDG PET/MRI reduce the number of indeterminate abdominal incidentalomas compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT?
    Schaarschmidt, Benedikt M.
    Grueneisen, Johannes
    Heusch, Philipp
    Gomez, Benedikt
    Umutlu, Lale
    Ruhlmann, Verena
    Rosenbaum-Krumme, Sandra
    Antoch, Gerald
    Buchbender, Christian
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2015, 36 (06) : 588 - 595
  • [35] Staging of Breast Cancer with 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT
    Aukema, Tjeerd S.
    Rutgers, Emiel J. T.
    Vogel, Wouter V.
    Olmos, Renato A. Valdes
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING REVIEWS, 2009, 5 (04) : 203 - 209
  • [36] The impact of baseline 18F-FDG PET-CT on the management and outcome of patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review
    Foley, Kieran G.
    Coomer, Will
    Coles, Bernadette
    Bradley, Kevin M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 95 (1139)
  • [37] 18F-FDG PET/CT for evaluation of metastases in nonsmall cell lung cancer on the efficacy of immunotherapy
    Feng, Yawen
    Wang, Peng
    Chen, Yuqi
    Dai, Wenli
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 44 (10) : 900 - 909
  • [38] 18F-FDG PET/CT in diagnosis of skeletal metastases
    Li Na
    Li Yaming
    Yang Chunming
    Li Xuena
    Yin Yafu
    Zhou Jiumao
    NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNIQUES, 2009, 20 (06) : 354 - 358
  • [39] 18F-FDG PET/CT in Diagnostic and Prognostic Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Recurrence of Chondrosarcoma
    Vadi, Shelvin Kumar
    Mittal, Bhagwant Rai
    Gorla, Arun Kumar Reddy
    Sood, Ashwani
    Basher, Rajender Kumar
    Sood, Apurva
    Kakkar, Nandita
    Sen, Ramesh K.
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 43 (02) : 87 - 93
  • [40] Thoracic Staging in Lung Cancer: Prospective Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/MR Imaging and 18F-FDG PET/CT
    Heusch, Philipp
    Buchbender, Christian
    Koehler, Jens
    Nensa, Felix
    Gauler, Thomas
    Gomez, Benedikt
    Reiss, Henning
    Stamatis, Georgios
    Kuehl, Hilmar
    Hartung, Verena
    Heusner, Till A.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 55 (03) : 373 - 378