Controlled Clinical Comparison of BacT/Alert FA Plus and FN Plus Blood Culture Media with BacT/Alert FA and FN Blood Culture Media

被引:37
|
作者
Kirn, T. J. [1 ]
Mirrett, S. [2 ]
Reller, L. B. [2 ]
Weinstein, M. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
关键词
STREAM INFECTIONS; BOTTLES; BACTEREMIA; FUNGEMIA; AEROBIC/F;
D O I
10.1128/JCM.03063-13
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
New blood culture media containing antibiotic-binding polymeric beads have been developed for the BacT/Alert (bioMerieux, Inc., Durham, NC) blood culture system. To assess the performance of these new media, we compared the new BacT/Alert aerobic medium (FA Plus) with resins to BacT/Alert FA medium with activated charcoal and the new BacT/Alert anaerobic medium (FN Plus) to BacT/Alert FN medium at 3 tertiary care medical centers. Study bottle pairs were inoculated with a target volume of 6 to 10 ml of blood from adults and incubated in the BacT/Alert 3D blood culture instrument. In the FA Plus versus FA comparison, there were 1,507 study pairs. Among 170 isolates causing true bloodstream infections (BSIs), significantly more Staphylococcus aureus (P < 0.001) and total microorganisms (P < 0.01) grew in the FA Plus bottle than in the FA bottle. Fewer coagulase-negative staphylococcal (CoNS) contaminants grew in the FA Plus bottle than in the FA bottle (10 versus 22; P = 0.05). In addition, growth was detected earlier in the FA Plus bottle than in the FA bottle (P < 0.001). In the FN Plus versus FN comparison, there were 2,386 study pairs. Among 201 isolates causing true BSIs, significantly more S. aureus (P < 0.001), CoNS (P < 0.005), and total microorganisms (P < 0.001) grew in the FN Plus bottle than in the FN bottle. Also, significantly more CoNS contaminants grew in the FN Plus bottle than in the FN bottle (P < 0.001). Overall, microorganisms were detected earlier in the FN Plus than in the FN bottle (P < 0.001). Medical technologists at all 3 study sites preferred the new media for Gram stain interpretation. We conclude that the FA Plus and FN Plus media provide improved and earlier detection of microorganisms compared with the FA and FN media and are preferable for Gram stain interpretation as well.
引用
收藏
页码:839 / 843
页数:5
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [31] Comparison of 2 Blood Culture Media Shows Significant Differences in Bacterial Recovery for Patients on Antimicrobial Therapy
    Zadroga, Rebecca
    Williams, David N.
    Gottschall, Richard
    Hanson, Kevan
    Nordberg, Vickie
    Deike, Marcia
    Kuskowski, Mike
    Carlson, Lisa
    Nicolau, David P.
    Sutherland, Christina
    Hansen, Glen T.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2013, 56 (06) : 790 - 797
  • [32] Recovery and time to growth of isolates in blood culture bottles: Comparison of BD Bactec Plus Aerobic/F and BD Bactec Plus Anaerobic/F bottles
    Passerini, Rita
    Cassatella, Maria Cristina
    Salvatici, Michela
    Bottari, Fabio
    Mauro, Cristian
    Radice, Davide
    Sandri, Maria Teresa
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2014, 46 (04) : 288 - 293
  • [33] Comparison of BD Bactec Plus Aerobic/F Medium to VersaTREK Redox 1 Blood Culture Medium for Detection of Candida spp. in Seeded Blood Culture Specimens Containing Therapeutic Levels of Antifungal Agents
    Riedel, Stefan
    Eisinger, Stephen W.
    Dam, Lisa
    Stamper, Paul D.
    Carroll, Karen C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 49 (04) : 1524 - 1529
  • [34] Controlled Evaluation of Bactec Peds Plus/F and Bactec Lytic/10 Anaerobic/F Media for Isolation of Salmonella enterica Serovars Typhi and Paratyphi A from Blood
    Reller, Megan E.
    Zaidi, Anita K. M.
    Sultana, Shazia
    Azeem, Shazia
    Hanif, Beenish
    Qureshi, Shahida
    Hasan, Rumina
    Bhutta, Zulfiqar
    Akhter, Rehana
    Goldmann, Donald A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2009, 47 (01) : 245 - 246