Clozapine combined with different antipsychotic drugs for treatment resistant schizophrenia

被引:52
作者
Cipriani, Andrea [1 ]
Boso, Marianna [2 ]
Barbui, Corrado
机构
[1] Univ Verona, Dept Med & Publ Hlth, Sect Psychiat & Clin Psychol, Policlin GB Rossi, I-37134 Verona, Italy
[2] Univ Pavia, Sect Psychiat, Dept Appl Hlth & Behav Sci, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2009年 / 03期
关键词
DOUBLE-BLIND; AUGMENTATION STRATEGIES; STATISTICS NOTES; RATING-SCALE; RISPERIDONE; EFFICACY; TRIALS; TOLERABILITY; HALOPERIDOL; OLANZAPINE;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD006324.pub2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Although clozapine has been shown to be the treatment of choice in people with schizophrenia that are resistant to treatment, one third to two thirds of people still have persistent positive symptoms despite clozapine monotherapy of adequate dosage and duration. The need to provide effective therapeutic interventions to patients who do not have an optimal response to clozapine is the most common reason for simultaneously prescribing a second antipsychotic drug in combination with clozapine. Objectives To determine the efficacy and tolerability of various clozapine combination strategies with antipsychotics in people with treatment resistant schizophrenia. Search strategy We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (March 2008) and MEDLINE (up to November 2008). We checked reference lists of all identified randomised controlled trials and requested pharmaceutical companies marketing investigational products to provide relevant published and unpublished data. Selection criteria We included only randomised controlled trials recruiting people of both sexes, aged 18 years or more, with a diagnosis of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (or related disorders) and comparing clozapine plus another antipsychotic drug with clozapine plus a different antipsychotic drug. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently extracted data and resolved disagreement by discussion with third member of the team. When insufficient data were provided, we contacted the study authors. Main results Three small (range of number of participants 28 to 60) randomised controlled trials were included in the review. Even though results from individual studies did not find that one combination strategy is better than the others, the methodological quality of included studies was too low to allow authors to use the collected data to answer the research question correctly. Authors' conclusions In this review we considered the risk of bias too high because of the poor quality of the retrieved information (small sample size, heterogeneity of comparisons, flaws in the design, conduct and analysis). Although clinical guidelines recommend a second antipsychotic in addition to clozapine in partially responsive patients with schizophrenia, the present systematic review was not able to show if any particular combination strategy was superior to the others. New, properly conducted, randomised controlled trials independent from the pharmaceutical industry need to recruit many more patients to give a reliable estimate of effect or of no effect of antipsychotics as combination treatment with clozapine in patients who do not have an optimal response to clozapine monotherapy.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Statistics notes - Detecting skewness from summary information [J].
Altman, DG ;
Bland, JM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 313 (7066) :1200-1200
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, SCHIZ COR INT TREATM
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1976, ECDEU ASSESSMENT MAN
[4]  
[Anonymous], CHINESE J NERVOUS ME
[5]  
[Anonymous], P 15 COCHR C 2007 OC
[6]  
[Anonymous], J CLIN PSYCHOL MED
[7]  
[Anonymous], J CLIN EPIDEMIOLOGY
[8]  
[Anonymous], TIANJIN PHARM
[9]  
[Anonymous], CHINESE J MED RES
[10]  
[Anonymous], SHANGHAI PSYCHOL MED