On the actual and observed process capability indices: A signal-to-noise ratio model

被引:7
作者
Dalalah, Doraid [1 ]
Hani, Dania Bani [1 ]
机构
[1] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Ind Engn, Irbid 22110, Jordan
关键词
Measurement errors; process capability index; Repeatability and reproducibility; Signal-to-noise ratio; MEASUREMENT SYSTEM-ANALYSIS; GAUGE REPEATABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; PERFORMANCE; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.measurement.2015.12.018
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In the evaluation of process capability, gauge measurement errors usually distort the measured data yielding two dissimilar capability indices, particularly, the actual and the observed process capability indices (AC(p) and OCp). Gauge measurement errors result in underestimation of the actual process capability, consequently, the variance of gauge errors has to be assessed to better chart the relationship between the AC(p) and OCp. The different variance components of a measurement system can be assessed by a gauge repeatability and reproducibility (GR&R) study. This paper presents novel relationships between the AC(p) and OCp by means of a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) model. The probability density functions of both indices will be presented in terms of SNR and a procedure to find the critical values of AC(p) and OCp is established. In contrast to literature studies, a measurement system can now be described by a novel alpha-beta characteristic curve. Different SNR values will result in different alpha-beta curves, hence, the acceptance of a measurement system depends on the specified significance values of alpha and beta and not solely on strict SNR values. Since measured data yields two different AC(p) and OCp distributions, type I and type II error analysis can be performed. Different case studies are presented to validate the resulting relationships and distributions. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 250
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS
[2]  
Backes Bianca, 2015, IFAC PAPERSONLINE, V48, P2380
[3]   A review of methods for measurement systems capability analysis [J].
Burdick, RK ;
Borror, CM ;
Montgomery, DC .
JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 35 (04) :342-354
[4]   Criteria of determining the P/T upper limits of GR&R in MSA [J].
Chen, K. S. ;
Wu, C. H. ;
Chen, S. C. .
QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2008, 42 (01) :23-33
[5]  
JHENG SL, 2001, MEASUR INFORM, V77, P23
[6]  
Laux C. M., 2007, AGR BIOSYST ENG
[7]   Approval criteria for multivariate measurement systems [J].
Majeske, Karl D. .
JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 40 (02) :140-153
[8]  
Michele Scagliarini, 2015, QUAL RELIAB ENG INT, V31, P329
[9]  
Montgomery D.C., 1993, Quality Engineering, V6, P289, DOI DOI 10.1080/08982119308918725
[10]  
Montgomery DC., 2005, INTRO STAT QUALITY C, P327