Objective Construction of Ground Truth Images

被引:0
作者
Smith, Mark [1 ]
Maiti, Ananda [2 ]
Maxwell, Andrew [1 ]
Kist, Alexander A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Queensland, Sch Mech & Elect Engn, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Discipline ICT, Newnham, Australia
来源
CROSS REALITY AND DATA SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING | 2021年 / 1231卷
关键词
Computer vision; Edge detection; Ground truth;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-52575-0_24
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In the context of virtual and augmented reality, computer vision plays a pivotal role. To benchmark performance, evaluation of computer vision models, such as edge detection is essential. Traditionally this has relied on subjective analysis of the resultant images. Alternatively, models have been assessed against ground truth images. However, ground truth images are highly subjective, relying on human judging to determine the appropriate location of features. Literature complains about the lack of objective quantitative measures for model evaluation, yet no solution has been presented. Ground truth is the objective verification of properties of an image. In the context of this paper it is a data set that includes an accurate and complete representation of the edges. The subjective nature of creating ground truth images has meant that true image analysis model evaluation has been limited. Reducing the level of subjective decisions can improve the confidence level when measuring the performance of computer vision image analysis models. This work describes a new method to improve ground truth image confidence through an automated computer vision feature detection model voting system.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 312
页数:13
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Contour Detection and Hierarchical Image Segmentation [J].
Arbelaez, Pablo ;
Maire, Michael ;
Fowlkes, Charless ;
Malik, Jitendra .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2011, 33 (05) :898-916
[3]   Enhancing Nursing Education with Remote Access Laboratories [J].
Bowtell, Les ;
Moloney, Clint ;
Kist, Alexander A. ;
Parker, Victoria ;
Maxwell, Andrew ;
Reedy, Natasha .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONLINE ENGINEERING, 2012, 8 (SPECIAL ISSUE 2) :52-59
[4]   Edge detector evaluation using empirical ROC curves [J].
Bowyer, K ;
Kranenburg, C ;
Dougherty, S .
COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE UNDERSTANDING, 2001, 84 (01) :77-103
[6]   QUANTITATIVE-EVALUATION OF EDGE DETECTION SCHEMES AND THEIR COMPARISON WITH HUMAN PERFORMANCE [J].
FRAM, JR ;
DEUTSCH, ES .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS, 1975, C 24 (06) :616-628
[7]   Comparison of edge detectors: A methodology and initial study [J].
Heath, M ;
Sarkar, S ;
Sanocki, T ;
Bowyer, K .
1996 IEEE COMPUTER SOCIETY CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION, PROCEEDINGS, 1996, :143-148
[8]   Presence: Concept, determinants and measurement [J].
IJsselsteijn, WA ;
de Ridder, H ;
Freeman, J ;
Avons, SE .
HUMAN VISION AND ELECTRONIC IMAGING V, 2000, 3959 :520-529
[9]   On remote and virtual experiments in eLearning [J].
University of Stuttgart, Computing Center RUS, 70550 Stuttgart, Germany ;
不详 .
Journal of Software, 2007, 2 (06) :76-85
[10]   COMPUTER DETERMINATION OF CONSTITUENT STRUCTURE OF BIOLOGICAL IMAGES [J].
KIRSCH, RA .
COMPUTERS AND BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, 1971, 4 (03) :315-&