Blind intubation through an i-gel® in the prone position: A prospective cohort study

被引:7
作者
van Dijck, Maarten [1 ]
Houweling, Bernard M. [1 ]
Koning, Mark, V [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Haaglanden Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, The Hague, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Anesthesiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Rijnstate Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care, Arnhem, Netherlands
关键词
Intubation; prone position; supraglottic airway device;
D O I
10.1177/0310057X20954443
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Accidental extubation in the prone position is a medical emergency in which quick and low resource demanding airway management is required. Regaining oxygenation is the primary goal, but sometimes intubation may be required to regain oxygenation. Blind intubation through an i-gel (R) (Intersurgical Ltd, Wokingham, Berkshire, UK) may be a quick and low resource demanding method. However, the success rate of the use of an i-gel as an incubation conduit in the prone position is unknown. This was a prospective study in patients scheduled for lumbar surgery. General anaesthesia was induced in the prone position and an i-gel was inserted. After successful ventilation, up to three attempts at intubation using a VivaSight-SL single-lumen tube (Ambu A/S, Ballerup, Denmark) were performed. The first attempt was blinded for the operator and the patient's head was in a neutral position. The second attempt was blinded for the operator with the patient's head rotated laterally. The third attempt was on-screen and allowed various manoeuvres to facilitate intubation. A success rate of 70% was deemed clinically acceptable. The study was terminated early after 14 subjects because the success rate of 70% was not achievable. However, ventilation using the i-gel in the prone position was successful in 13 patients (93%). Intubation was successful in only one patient at the first attempt, one patient at the second attempt and three patients at the third attempt. Overall, the success rate was 36%. Blind intubation using an i-gel as an intubation conduit in the prone position is not recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 443
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Abrishami A, 2010, CAN J ANESTH, V57, P1014, DOI 10.1007/s12630-010-9378-1
[2]  
Bhandari Geeta, 2013, Anesth Essays Res, V7, P94, DOI 10.4103/0259-1162.114012
[3]  
Bielski A, 2018, MEDICINE BALTIMORE
[4]  
Bosch L, 2017, REV ESP ANEST REANIM, V64, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.redar.2016.11.002
[5]   I-Gel as an intubation conduit: Comparison of three different types of endotracheal tubes [J].
Choudhary, Nitin ;
Kumar, Abhijit ;
Kohli, Amit ;
Wadhawan, Sonia ;
Bhadoria, Poonam .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 63 (03) :218-224
[6]  
Gupta Babita, 2015, J Emerg Trauma Shock, V8, P188, DOI 10.4103/0974-2700.166589
[7]   Tracheal Intubation Through the I-gel™ Supraglottic Airway Versus the LMA Fastrach™: A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Halwagi, Antoine Elie ;
Massicotte, Nathalie ;
Lallo, Alexandre ;
Gauthier, Alain ;
Boudreault, Daniel ;
Ruel, Monique ;
Girard, Francois .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2012, 114 (01) :152-156
[8]   Tracheal intubation with a camera embedded in the tube tip (Vivasight™) [J].
Huitink, J. M. ;
Koopman, E. M. ;
Bouwman, R. A. ;
Craenen, A. ;
Verwoert, M. ;
Krage, R. ;
Visser, I. E. ;
Erwteman, M. ;
van Groeningen, D. ;
Tijink, R. ;
Schauer, A. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 68 (01) :74-78
[9]  
Kang F, 2015, J NEUROSURG ANESTH, V27, P37, DOI 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000088
[10]   Comparison of supraglottic devices i-gel (R) and LMA Fastrach((R)) as conduit for endotracheal intubation [J].
Kapoor, Sameer ;
Das Jethava, Dharam ;
Gupta, Priyamvada ;
Jethava, Durga ;
Kumar, Alok .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 58 (04) :397-402