How Frequently Do the Results from Completed US Clinical Trials Enter the Public Domain? - A Statistical Analysis of the ClinicalTrials.gov Database

被引:53
作者
Saito, Hiroki [1 ]
Gill, Christopher J. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Carney Hosp, Dept Med, Dorchester, MA USA
[2] Boston Univ, Ctr Global Hlth & Dev, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Int Hlth, Boston, MA USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 07期
关键词
BIAS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0101826
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Achieving transparency in clinical trials, through either publishing results in a journal or posting results to the ClinicalTrials.gov (CTG) web site, is an essential public health good. However, it remains unknown what proportion of completed studies achieve public disclosure of results (PDOR), or what factors explain these differences. Methods: We analyzed data from 400 randomly selected studies within the CTG database that had been listed as 'completed' and had at least four years in which to disclose results. Using Kaplan-Meier curves, we calculated times from completion to PDOR (defined as publishing the primary outcomes in a journal and/or posting results to CTG), and identified explanatory variables predicting these outcomes using Cox proportional hazards models. Findings: Among the 400 clinical trials, 118 (29.5%) failed to achieve PDOR within four years of completion. The median day from study completion to PDOR among 282 studies (70.5%) that achieved PDOR was 602 days (mean 647 days, SD 454 days). Studies were less likely to achieve PDOR if at earlier stages (phase 2 vs. phase 3/4, adjusted HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.47-0.78), if they only included adult subjects (adjusted HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.83), involved randomization (adjusted HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.83), or had smaller sample sizes (<= 50 subjects vs. >50, adjusted HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.44-0.83). Industry-funded studies were significantly less likely to be published than non-industry or blended studies (adjusted HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.36-0.66). Conclusions: A significant proportion of completed studies did not achieve PDOR within the four years of follow-up, particularly smaller studies at earlier stages of development with industry funding. This constitutes reporting bias and threatens the validity of the clinical research literature in the US.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Assessment of publication bias, selection bias, and unavailable data in meta-analyses using individual participant data: a database survey
    Ahmed, Ikhlaaq
    Sutton, Alexander J.
    Riley, Richard D.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 344
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, BMJ
  • [3] [Anonymous], DAT EL DEF DRAFT
  • [4] Clinical trial registration - A statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
    DeAngelis, CD
    Drazen, JM
    Frizelle, FA
    Haug, C
    Hoey, J
    Horton, R
    Kotzin, S
    Laine, C
    Marusic, A
    Overbeke, AJPM
    Schroeder, TV
    Sox, HC
    Van der Weyden, MB
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2005, 131 (06) : 479 - 480
  • [5] PUBLICATION BIAS IN CLINICAL RESEARCH
    EASTERBROOK, PJ
    BERLIN, JA
    GOPALAN, R
    MATTHEWS, DR
    [J]. LANCET, 1991, 337 (8746) : 867 - 872
  • [6] How often do US-based human subjects research studies register on time, and how often do they post their results? A statistical analysis of the Clinicaltrials.gov database
    Gill, Christopher J.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2012, 2 (04):
  • [7] Research without results: Inadequate public reporting of clinical trial results
    Gopal, Ravi K.
    Yamashita, Traci E.
    Prochazka, Allan V.
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2012, 33 (03) : 486 - 491
  • [8] Publication of Trials Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
    Gordon, David
    Taddei-Peters, Wendy
    Mascette, Alice
    Antman, Melissa
    Kaufmann, Peter G.
    Lauer, Michael S.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 369 (20) : 1926 - 1934
  • [9] Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results
    Hopewell, Sally
    Loudon, Kirsty
    Clarke, Mike J.
    Oxman, Andrew D.
    Dickersin, Kay
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (01):
  • [10] Publication bias against negative results from clinical trials: three of the seven deadly sins
    Johnson, Richard T.
    Dickersin, Kay
    [J]. NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE NEUROLOGY, 2007, 3 (11): : 590 - 591