Improved outcomes in patients with positive metal sensitivity following revision total knee arthroplasty

被引:31
作者
Zondervan, Robert L. [1 ]
Vaux, Jonathan J. [2 ]
Blackmer, Michael J. [2 ]
Brazier, Brett G. [1 ]
Taunt, Charles J., Jr. [2 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Coll Osteopath Med, 965 Wilson Rd, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] McLaren Orthoped Hosp, 2727 S Penn Ave, Lansing, MI 48910 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Metal allergy; Metal sensitivity; Arthroplasty; Orthopedics; Knee; Hip; Lymphocyte transformation test; LTT; TOTAL HIP; HYPERSENSITIVITY; ALLERGY; REPLACEMENT; PREVALENCE; IMPLANTS; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1186/s13018-019-1228-4
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundMetal sensitivity as a cause for painful joint replacement has become increasingly prevalent; however, there is a lack of reported clinical outcome data from total knee arthroplasty patients with metal allergies. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients presenting with a painful total knee arthroplasty with a positive metal sensitivity have improved outcomes following revision to a hypoallergenic implant.MethodsA retrospective review was conducted for patients that underwent a revision total knee arthroplasty after metal sensitivity testing over a 3-year period from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2017. Based on the results of sensitivity testing, patients underwent revision total knee arthroplasty to a hypoallergenic component or a standard component. Following revision, patients returned to the clinic at an interval of 6weeks, 5months, and 12months for functional, pain, and satisfaction assessment. Outcomes were compared within and between sensitivity groups.ResultsOf the included patients, 78.3% (39/46) were positive for metal sensitivity. The most common metal sensitivity was to nickel (79.5%, 32/39). Both non-reactive and reactive patients significantly improved in range of motion after revision arthroplasty. The reactive group saw a 37.8% decrease in pain at 6weeks post-revision (p<0.001) Whereas, the non-reactive group only saw a moderate, non-significant improvement in pain reduction at 6weeks post-revision (27.0%; p=0.29). Frequency of pain experienced did not vary significantly between groups. Maximum metal lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) sensitivity score did not correlate with pain level at the time of revision (R-2=0.02, p=0.38) or percent improvement after revision (R-2=0.001, p=0.81). Overall, all patients reported being very satisfied after revision total knee arthroplasty; there was no difference between positive and negative sensitivity groups (W=62, p=0.89).ConclusionsPatients presenting with a painful knee arthroplasty and positive metal LTT have improved pain scores, walking function, and range of motion following revision to a hypoallergenic component. This study also provides a treatment algorithm for patients presenting with a painful knee replacement, in order to provide effective and timely diagnosis and management.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Metal allergy in total-joint arthroplasty Case report and literature review [J].
Bao, Wei ;
He, Yao ;
Fan, Yuanjun ;
Liao, Yueming .
MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (38)
[2]   Metal hypersensitivity in total knee arthroplasty: Revision surgery using a ceramic femoral component - A case report [J].
Bergschmidt, Philipp ;
Bader, Rainer ;
Mittelmeier, Wolfram .
KNEE, 2012, 19 (02) :144-147
[3]   Prevalence of Self-Reported Metal Allergy in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty [J].
Bloemke, Adam D. ;
Clarke, Henry D. .
JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2015, 28 (03) :243-245
[4]   Females with Unexplained Joint Pain Following Total Joint Arthroplasty Exhibit a Higher Rate and Severity of Hypersensitivity to Implant Metals Compared with Males [J].
Caicedo, Marco S. ;
Solver, Edward ;
Coleman, Latasha ;
Jacobs, Joshua J. ;
Hallab, Nadim J. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2017, 99 (08) :621-628
[5]  
Dettori Joseph R, 2011, Evid Based Spine Care J, V2, P7, DOI 10.1055/s-0030-1267080
[6]   Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale [J].
Farrar, JT ;
Young, JP ;
LaMoreaux, L ;
Werth, JL ;
Poole, RM .
PAIN, 2001, 94 (02) :149-158
[7]  
Faschingbauer Martin, 2017, HSS J, V13, P12, DOI 10.1007/s11420-016-9514-8
[8]  
Fehring TK, 2001, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P315
[9]   Particle disease: Biologic mechanisms of periprosthetic osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty [J].
Gallo, Jiri ;
Goodman, Stuart B. ;
Konttinen, Yrjo T. ;
Raska, Milan .
INNATE IMMUNITY, 2013, 19 (02) :213-224
[10]   Metal sensitivity in patients with orthopaedic implants [J].
Hallab, N ;
Merritt, K ;
Jacobs, JJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2001, 83A (03) :428-436