Hearing status, need for recovery after work, and psychosocial work characteristics: Results from an internet-based national survey on hearing

被引:133
作者
Nachtegaal, Janneke [1 ,4 ]
Kuik, Dirk J. [2 ]
Anema, Johannes R. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Goverts, S. Theo [1 ,4 ]
Festen, Joost M. [1 ,4 ]
Kramer, Sophia E. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept ENT Audiol, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Publ & Occupat Hlth, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, EMGO Inst Hlth & Care Res, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, UWV, AMC, Res Ctr Insurance Med, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Hearing impairment; SRTn; Work Need for recovery after work; Job demand; Job control; Social support; Psychosocial work characteristics; Sick leave; NL-SH; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HEALTH; IMPAIRMENT; NOISE; FATIGUE; EMPLOYMENT; ASSOCIATION; RELIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1080/14992020902962421
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
The main aim of the study is to address the relationship between hearing status and need for recovery. In addition, the role of hearing status in the relationship between psychosocial work characteristics (i.e. job demands and job control) and need for recovery was assessed. The sample comprised 925 normally-hearing and hearing-impaired working adults (aged 18-65 years) participating in the National Longitudinal Study on Hearing. Hearing status was determined using the national hearing (speechin-noise) test over the internet. Psychosocial work characteristics and need for recovery were assessed using the job content questionnaire and the Dutch questionnaire on the experience and assessment of work. Regression models revealed a significant association between hearing status and need for recovery after work, poorer hearing leading to an increasing need for recovery. Additionally, poorer hearing led to a higher odds for risky levels of need for recovery. Hearing status did not influence the significant relationship between psychosocial work characteristics (i.e. job demand and job control) and need for recovery after work. Implications for clinical practice, such as the necessity of having adequate enablement programs for this specific group of patients, are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:684 / 691
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[21]  
Karasek R., 1990, Healthy work: Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life, DOI DOI 10.1016/0003-6870(92)90320-U
[22]  
Karasek R. A., 1985, Job Content Questionnaire users guide, DOI DOI 10.1037/T03609-000
[23]   A five-year longitudinal study of hearing in a Danish rural population aged 31-50 years [J].
Karlsmose, B ;
Lauritzen, T ;
Engberg, M ;
Parving, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2000, 34 (01) :47-55
[24]   The world health organization health and work performance questionnaire (HPQ) [J].
Kessler, RC ;
Barber, C ;
Beck, A ;
Berglund, P ;
Cleary, PD ;
McKenas, D ;
Pronk, N ;
Simon, G ;
Stang, P ;
Ustun, TB ;
Wang, P .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2003, 45 (02) :156-174
[25]  
Kramer S.E., 2005, The impact of genetic hearing impairment, P137
[26]   Hearing impairment, work, and vocational enablement [J].
Kramer, Sophia E. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2008, 47 :S124-S130
[27]   Occupational performance: Comparing normally-hearing and hearing-impaired employees using the Amsterdam Checklist for Hearing and Work [J].
Kramer, Sophia E. ;
Kapteyn, Theo S. ;
Houtgast, Tammo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2006, 45 (09) :503-512
[28]   Psychosocial work conditions, unemployment and self-reported psychological health:: a population-based study [J].
Lindström, M .
OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 2005, 55 (07) :568-571
[29]  
Mathers C., 2003, GLOBAL BURDEN HEARIN
[30]   Working in noise with a hearing loss: Perceptions from workers, supervisors, and hearing conservation program managers [J].
Morata, TC ;
Themann, CL ;
Randolph, RF ;
Verbsky, BL ;
Byrne, DC ;
Reeves, ER .
EAR AND HEARING, 2005, 26 (06) :529-545