Palm oil industry in South East Asia and the effluent treatment technology-A review

被引:133
作者
Iskandar, Muhammad Johan [1 ]
Baharum, Azizah [1 ,2 ]
Anuar, Farah Hannan [1 ,2 ]
Othaman, Rizafizah [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Sci & Technol, Sch Chem Sci & Food Technol, Bangi, Malaysia
[2] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Sci & Technol, Polymer Res Ctr, Bangi, Malaysia
关键词
Palm oil; POME; Membrane; Aerobic digestion; Anaerobic digestion; Physicochemical; WASTE-WATER TREATMENT; ADVANCED OXIDATION PROCESSES; DISSOLVED-AIR FLOTATION; MORINGA-OLEIFERA SEEDS; MILL EFFLUENT; POME TREATMENT; ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANE; COAGULATION-FLOCCULATION; PROCESS INTENSIFICATION; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.eti.2017.11.003
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The progress of Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) treatment in meeting with the regulation and standard stipulated by the Environmental Authority always been a major issue in Palm oil industries. To occupy the palm oil world market demand, palm oil industry needs to produce more than the market demand to supply necessity. Currently, South East Asia country such as Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand rank the top country with the largest production of palm oil in the world. However, the increasing demand for the palm oil has resulted in even massive waste especially palm oil mill effluent (POME). Direct discharge of POME will adversely affect the environment. In 2011, 53 million tonnes metric of palm oil produced and 89% of this production comes from Malaysia and Indonesia. Thailand, however, used the palm oil solely for domestic usage. Since POME has been declared among the major source of pollution, a great deal of research and development including application devoted to enhance the current treatment method for POME to consistently meet the proposed stringent regulatory requirement by environmental authority. Conventional treatment such as ponding system is the most commonplace method to treat POME through the application of ponding system which is include aerobic and anaerobic treatment. Recently, the alternative methods such as coagulation, flocculation, adsorption, advanced oxidation process (AOP) and membrane technology to treat POME has shown a promising result compared to the conventional method. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 185
页数:17
相关论文
共 184 条
[31]   Phosphate adsorption in flocculation processes of aluminium sulphate and poly-aluminium-silicate-sulphate [J].
Boisvert, JP ;
To, TC ;
Berrak, A ;
Jolicoeur, C .
WATER RESEARCH, 1997, 31 (08) :1939-1946
[32]   Anaerobic treatment of palm oil mill effluent in a two-stage up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) system [J].
Borja, R ;
Banks, CJ ;
Sanchez, E .
JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1996, 45 (02) :125-135
[33]   COMPARISON OF AN ANAEROBIC FILTER AND AN ANAEROBIC FLUIDIZED-BED REACTOR TREATING PALM OIL MILL EFFLUENT [J].
BORJA, R ;
BANKS, CJ .
PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY, 1995, 30 (06) :511-521
[34]   TREATMENT OF PALM OIL MILL EFFLUENT BY UPFLOW ANAEROBIC FILTRATION [J].
BORJA, R ;
BANKS, CJ .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1994, 61 (02) :103-109
[35]   Is oil palm the next emerging threat to the Amazon? [J].
Butler, Rhett A. ;
Laurance, William F. .
TROPICAL CONSERVATION SCIENCE, 2009, 2 (01) :1-10
[36]  
Carlson KM, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P283, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1702, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1702]
[37]   Performance of different advanced oxidation processes for tertiary wastewater treatment to remove the pesticide acetamiprid [J].
Carra, Irene ;
Sanchez Perez, Jose Antonio ;
Malato, Sixto ;
Autin, Olivier ;
Jefferson, Bruce ;
Jarvis, Peter .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2016, 91 (01) :72-81
[38]  
Chan KS, 1984, P REG WORKSH PALM OI, P185
[39]   Optimization on thermophilic aerobic treatment of anaerobically digested palm oil mill effluent (POME) [J].
Chan, Yi Jing ;
Chong, Mei Fong ;
Law, Chung Lim .
BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2011, 55 (03) :193-198
[40]   Low-cost membranes for use in a submerged MBR [J].
Chang, IS ;
Gander, M ;
Jefferson, B ;
Judd, SJ .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2001, 79 (B3) :183-188