An integration of water physicochemistry, algal bioassays, phytoplankton, and zooplankton for ecotoxicological assessment in a highly polluted lowland river

被引:24
作者
Olguín, HF
Puig, A
Loez, CR
Salibián, A
Topalián, ML
Castañé, PM
Rovedatti, MG
机构
[1] Museo Argentino Ciencias Nat Bernardino Rivadavia, Div Limnol, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Univ Buenos Aires, Dept Ciencias Biol, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[3] Univ Nacl Lujan, Programa Ecofisiol Aplicada, Lujan, Argentina
[4] Comis Invest Cient, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[5] Univ Nacl Comahue, LIBIQUIMA, Neuquen, Argentina
关键词
algal-bioassays; multivariate-analyses; phytoplankton; Reconquista River; South-America; urban-river; water-pollution; zooplankton;
D O I
10.1023/B:WATE.0000026538.51477.c2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Results of different approaches potentially useful for the evaluation of water ambient quality were analysed and compared in a small temperate lowland river with mixed diffuse and multiple-point source pollution. The Reconquista River ( Buenos Aires Province, Argentina), one of the most polluted watercourses of Latin America, receives agrochemicals as well as domestic and industrial ( mostly untreated) effluents. Physical and chemical water variables were determined; unispecies algal bioassays ( with Chlorella pyrenoidosa and Scenedesmus acutus) were carried out in laboratory; and density and structure of phyto- and zooplankton were analysed at three sites in four dates ( representing a range of likely conditions in the river). A general scheme of association among plankton, bioassays and physical/chemical variables was elaborated, that helped to infer possible control factors in this multi-stressed system. Some empirical methods, but mainly mathematical ones including multivariate techniques ( as PCA, cluster analysis), were applied for evaluation of samples. A preliminary selection of indices and attributes as potential indicators of the water river quality was made, and then applied for assay a tentative integrative ordination of samples. The relative best water quality was recorded when-where dissolved oxygen concentration, algal diversity and planktonic crustacean density were higher. The worst water quality corresponded to the lack of cladocerans and lowest crustacean density, and higher: organic and industrial pollution, major nutrients ( ammonium and orthophosphates), BOD, hardness, conductivity, algal biomass in bioassays, phytoplankton density (> 10 000 ind. mL(-1)), dominance of a single algal species (> 90%), and rotifer proportion in zooplankton (> 85%).
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 381
页数:27
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Abel PD, 1996, WATER POLLUTION BIOL
[2]  
ACCORINTI J., 1960, COMUN MUS ARGENTINO CIENC NAT BERNARDINO RIVADAVIA E INST NAC INVEST CIENC NAT CIENC BOT, V1, P21
[3]  
ANGELI N, 1979, CONTAMINACION AGUAS, P115
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1985, WATER QUAL B
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1963, PRINCIPLES NUMERICAL
[6]  
*APHA AWWA WPCF, 1992, STAND METH EX WAT WA
[7]  
Beron L., 1984, EVALUACION CALIDAD A
[8]   Evaluation of effluent toxicity and ambient toxicity in a polluted lowland river [J].
Bervoets, L ;
Baillieul, M ;
Blust, R ;
Verheyen, R .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 1996, 91 (03) :333-341
[9]   CADMIUM RESISTANCE IN DAPHNIA-MAGNA [J].
BODAR, CWM ;
VANDERSLUIS, I ;
VANMONTFORT, JCP ;
VOOGT, PA ;
ZANDEE, DI .
AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY, 1990, 16 (01) :33-39
[10]  
Boyle Terence P., 2001, Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/146349801753509203