Self-Directed Search Response Project

被引:1
作者
Bullock-Yowell, Emily [1 ]
Leuty, Melanie E. [1 ]
To, Yen M. [2 ]
Mathis, Erica [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Mississippi, Dept Psychol, 118 Coll Dr 5025, Hattiesburg, MS 39406 USA
[2] Missouri Western State Univ, St Joseph, MO USA
关键词
Self-Directed Search; response options; Holland's theory; RIASEC; interest assessment; VOCATIONAL INTERESTS; MECHANICAL TURK; OPTIMAL NUMBER; RELIABILITY; STABILITY; VALIDITY; SCALE; METAANALYSIS; ADOLESCENCE; ADULTHOOD;
D O I
10.1177/1069072715621532
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Many of the Holland-based interest assessments differ in the number of answer options they present to clients, with some providing clients more sensitivity with which they can indicate their level of interest. Following anecdotal client comments, a study was developed to determine whether significant changes in inventory results occurred based on the number of answer options presented, while test items remain consistent. Two versions of the Self-Directed Search (SDS)-Fifth Edition were presented to 553 participants across two subsamples (312 Mechanical Turk and 241 college students). The published version of the SDS that presents clients with two response options was used as well as an altered version presenting clients with five-answer options. The internal consistency and profile stability across versions were explored. Statistically significant differences in internal consistency were found. Moderate-to-high profile stability for individuals and across test versions was detected. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 311
页数:16
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Abd-El-Fattah S.M., 2011, Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods, V6, P59
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, SELF DIRECTED SEARCH
[3]  
[Anonymous], APA HDB CAREER INTER
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Development of the O*NET Interest Profiler
[5]  
[Anonymous], TESTING ASSESSMENT C
[6]   On measurements and their quality. Paper 4: Verbal anchors and the number of response options in rating scales [J].
Beckstead, Jason W. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2014, 51 (05) :807-814
[7]   PERSON RELIABILITY EVALUATED IN THE CONTEXT OF VOCATIONAL-INTEREST ASSESSMENT [J].
BERK, LA ;
FEKKEN, GC .
JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 1990, 37 (01) :7-16
[8]  
Brown M.B., 2001, The fourteenth mental measurements yearbook
[9]   Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data? [J].
Buhrmester, Michael ;
Kwang, Tracy ;
Gosling, Samuel D. .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 6 (01) :3-5
[10]   Test-retest reliability of psychological and neurobehavioral tests self-administered by computer [J].
Campbell, KA ;
Rohlman, DS ;
Storzbach, D ;
Binder, LM ;
Anger, WK ;
Kovera, CA ;
Davis, KL ;
Grossmann, SJ .
ASSESSMENT, 1999, 6 (01) :21-32