The feasibility of implementing risk stratification into a national breast cancer screening programme: a focus group study investigating the perspectives of healthcare personnel responsible for delivery

被引:15
作者
French, David P. [1 ]
Woof, Victoria G. [1 ]
Ruane, Helen [2 ]
Evans, D. Gareth [2 ,3 ]
Ulph, Fiona [1 ]
Donnelly, Louise S. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Manchester Ctr Hlth Psychol, Sch Hlth Sci, Div Psychol & Mental Hlth, Manchester, Lancs, England
[2] Manchester Univ NHS Fdn Trust, Nightingale & Prevent Breast Canc Res Unit, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Dept Genom Med, Div Evolut & Genom Sci, Manchester, Lancs, England
[4] Univ Manchester, Sch Hlth Sci, Div Populat Hlth Hlth Serv Res & Primary Care, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
Breast screening; Healthcare professionals; Implementation; Risk stratification; Focus groups; Thematic analysis; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1186/s12905-022-01730-0
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Providing women with personalized estimates of their risk of developing breast cancer, as part of routine breast cancer screening programmes, allows women at higher risk to be offered more frequent screening or drugs to reduce risk. For this to be feasible, the concept and practicalities have to be acceptable to the healthcare professionals who would put it in to practice. The present research investigated the acceptability to healthcare professionals who were responsible for the implementation of this new approach to screening in the ongoing BC-Predict study. Methods Four focus groups were conducted with 29 healthcare professionals from a variety of professional backgrounds working within three breast screening services in north-west England. An inductive-manifest thematic analysis was conducted. Results Overall, healthcare professionals viewed the implementation of personalised breast cancer risk estimation as a positive step, but discussion focused on concerns. Three major themes are presented. (1) Service constraints highlights the limited capacity within current breast services and concerns about the impact of additional workload. (2) Risk communication concerns the optimal way to convey risk to women within resource constraints. (3) Accentuating inequity discusses how risk stratification could decrease screening uptake for underserved groups. Conclusions Staff who implemented risk stratification considered it a positive addition to routine screening. They considered it essential to consider improving capacity and demands on healthcare professional time. They highlighted the need for skilled communication of risks and new pathways of care to ensure that stratification could be implemented in financially and time constrained settings without impacting negatively on women.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Braun V., 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
[2]  
Brown H, 2014, MEASURING HLTH NHS C
[3]   Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests [J].
Edwards, Adrian G. K. ;
Naik, Gurudutt ;
Ahmed, Harry ;
Elwyn, Glyn J. ;
Pickles, Timothy ;
Hood, Kerry ;
Playle, Rebecca .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (02) :1-96
[4]  
Esquivel-Sada Daphne, 2019, Healthc Policy, V15, P39, DOI 10.12927/hcpol.2019.26072
[5]   Breast cancer risk feedback to women in the UK NHS breast screening population [J].
Evans, D. Gareth R. ;
Donnelly, Louise S. ;
Harkness, Elaine F. ;
Astley, Susan M. ;
Stavrinos, Paula ;
Dawe, Sarah ;
Watterson, Donna ;
Fox, Lynne ;
Sergeant, Jamie C. ;
Ingham, Sarah ;
Harvie, Michelle N. ;
Wilson, Mary ;
Beetles, Ursula ;
Buchan, Iain ;
Brentnall, Adam R. ;
French, David P. ;
Cuzick, Jack ;
Howell, Anthony .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 114 (09) :1045-1052
[6]  
Evans DG., 2016, PROGRAM GRANTS APPL, V4, P11, DOI 10.3310/pgfar04110
[7]   Disability and participation in breast and bowel cancer screening in England: a large prospective study [J].
Floud, S. ;
Barnes, I. ;
Verfurden, M. ;
Kuper, H. ;
Gathani, T. ;
Blanks, R. G. ;
Alison, R. ;
Patnick, J. ;
Beral, V. ;
Green, J. ;
Reeves, G. K. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 117 (11) :1711-1714
[8]   What are the benefits and harms of risk stratified screening as part of the NHS breast screening Programme? Study protocol for a multi-site non-randomised comparison of BC-predict versus usual screening (NCT04359420) [J].
French, David P. ;
Astley, Susan ;
Brentnall, Adam R. ;
Cuzick, Jack ;
Dobrashian, Richard ;
Duffy, Stephen W. ;
Gorman, Louise S. ;
Harkness, Elaine F. ;
Harrison, Fiona ;
Harvie, Michelle ;
Howell, Anthony ;
Jerrison, Andrew ;
Machin, Matthew ;
Maxwel, Anthony J. ;
McWilliams, Lorna ;
Payne, Katherine ;
Qureshi, Nadeem ;
Ruane, Helen ;
Sampson, Sarah ;
Stavrinos, Paula ;
Thorpe, Emma ;
Ulph, Fiona ;
van Staa, Tjeerd ;
Woof, Victoria ;
Evans, D. Gareth .
BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
[9]   Psychological impact of providing women with personalised 10-year breast cancer risk estimates [J].
French, David P. ;
Southworth, Jake ;
Howell, Anthony ;
Harvie, Michelle ;
Stavrinos, Paula ;
Watterson, Donna ;
Sampson, Sarah ;
Evans, D. Gareth ;
Donnelly, Louise S. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 118 (12) :1648-1657
[10]   Psychosocial issues of a population approach to high genetic risk identification: Behavioural, emotional and informed choice issues [J].
French, David P. ;
Howell, Anthony ;
Evans, D. Gareth .
BREAST, 2018, 37 :148-153