Responses of hydropower generation and sustainability to changes in reservoir policy, climate and land use under uncertainty: A case study of Xinanjiang Reservoir in China

被引:32
作者
Guo, Yuxue [1 ]
Fang, Guohua [2 ]
Xu, Yue-Ping [1 ]
Tian, Xin [3 ,4 ]
Xie, Jingkai [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Inst Hydrol & Water Resources, Civil Engn & Architecture, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
[2] Hohai Univ, Coll Water Conservancy & Hydropower Engn, Nanjing 210098, Peoples R China
[3] KWR Water Res Inst, Groningenhaven 7, NL-3433 PE Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[4] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Water Management, Stevinweg 1, NL-2628 CN Delft, Netherlands
基金
浙江省自然科学基金;
关键词
Hydropower generation; Sustainability; Climate and land use change; Reservoir policy; Robust optimization; ROBUST DECISION-MAKING; CHANGE IMPACTS; LOESS PLATEAU; POWER SECTOR; RIVER-BASIN; WATER; RUNOFF; MANAGEMENT; CATCHMENT; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124609
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Climate and land use changes will affect the hydrological regime, and therefore hydropower. This study which aims to develop a novel modeling framework, does not only determine the changes in hydropower generation and sustainability, but also provide robust operating rules for handling uncertainty attributed to both climate and land use changes, using Xinanjiang Reservoir in Eastern China as a case study. Specifically, projections of five bias-corrected and downscaled General Circulation Models (GCMs) and three modeled land uses representing a range of tradeoffs between ecological protection and urban development are employed to drive the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) and to predict streamflow under 15 scenarios. We then develop a set of robust rule curves to consider the potential uncertainty in reservoir inflow and to increase hydropower generation, and a baseline rule is presented for comparison. Results show that both robust and baseline rules increase hydropower generation with increasing reservoir inflows in future, but the robust rule yields better hydropower generation, sustainability and efficiency. The streamflow under the rapid urbanization scenarios differs from that under other scenarios, but there are no significant differences in hydropower among scenarios corresponding to the non-linear relationship between streamflow and hydropower change. Our findings highlight the potential to improve water resource utilization in the future, especially based on the robust operating rule considering optimization and uncertainty, and can provide references for future hydropower planning to the other existing plants. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Understanding climate and land surface changes impact on water resources using Budyko framework and remote sensing data in Ethiopia [J].
Abera, Wuletawu ;
Tamene, Lulseged ;
Abegaz, Assefa ;
Solomon, Dawit .
JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS, 2019, 167 :56-64
[2]   Quantifying the relative impact of climate and human activities on streamflow [J].
Ahn, Kuk-Hyun ;
Merwade, Venkatesh .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2014, 515 :257-266
[3]   Modelling the effects of land use and climate changes on hydrology in the Ursern Valley, Switzerland [J].
Alaoui, A. ;
Willimann, E. ;
Jasper, K. ;
Felder, G. ;
Herger, F. ;
Magnusson, J. ;
Weingartner, R. .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2014, 28 (10) :3602-3614
[4]   Prediction of land use changes based on Land Change Modeler and attribution of changes in the water balance of Ganga basin to land use change using the SWAT model [J].
Anand, Jatin ;
Gosain, A. K. ;
Khosa, R. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 644 :503-519
[5]   Climate impacts on hydropower in Colombia: A multi-model assessment of power sector adaptation pathways [J].
Arango-Aramburo, Santiago ;
Turner, Sean W. D. ;
Daenzer, Kathryn ;
Pablo Rios-Ocampo, Juan ;
Hejazi, Mohamad I. ;
Kober, Tom ;
Alvarez-Espinosa, Andres C. ;
Romero-Otalora, German D. ;
van der Zwaan, Bob .
ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 128 :179-188
[6]   Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment - Part 1: Model development [J].
Arnold, JG ;
Srinivasan, R ;
Muttiah, RS ;
Williams, JR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 1998, 34 (01) :73-89
[7]  
Bartos MD, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P748, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2648, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2648]
[8]   Robust optimization of water infrastructure planning under deep uncertainty using metamodels [J].
Beh, Eva H. Y. ;
Zheng, Feifei ;
Dandy, Graeme C. ;
Maier, Holger R. ;
Kapelan, Zoran .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2017, 93 :92-105
[9]   Evaluation and application of a SWAT model to assess the climate change impact on the hydrology of the Himalayan River Basin [J].
Bhatta, Binod ;
Shrestha, Sangam ;
Shrestha, Pallav K. ;
Talchabhadel, Rocky .
CATENA, 2019, 181
[10]   Climate change impacts and greenhouse gas mitigation effects on US hydropower generation [J].
Boehlert, Brent ;
Strzepek, Kenneth M. ;
Gebretsadik, Yohannes ;
Swanson, Richard ;
McCluskey, Alyssa ;
Neumann, James E. ;
McFarland, James ;
Martinich, Jeremy .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 183 :1511-1519