Diagnostic Value of Prostate Specific Antigen and Its Density in Iranian Men with Prostate Cancer

被引:0
作者
Lotfi, M. [1 ]
Assadsangabi, R. [1 ]
Shirazi, M. [2 ]
Jali, R. [1 ]
Assadsangabi, A. [1 ]
Nabavizadeh, S. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Dept Radiol, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Dept Urol, Shiraz, Iran
关键词
Prostate-specific antigen; Density; Prostate cancer; PREDICTIVE-VALUE; CARCINOMA; ENHANCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The specific threshold for prostate-specific antigen and density (PSA, PSAD) to delineate which patients are at the highest risk has been controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of PSA and PSAD in Iranian patients with prostate cancer. Methods: Three hundred men with the serum PSA greater than 4.0 ng/ml, abnormal digital rectal examination and/or suspicious transrectal ultrasound underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies. PSAD was calculated by dividing the serum PSA in ng/ml by the volume of the entire prostate in cm(3). Correlation with Gleason grade of the tumor was also made. The patients were divided into three groups according to their PSA values. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was produced from the raw data on all patients. Results: One hundred and two patients showed a cancer rate of 34%. The mean PSA and PSAD of the cancer group were significantly higher than those of the non-cancer group with better performance of PSAD as confirmed by ROC curve. In patients with PSA levels between 4 and 10 ng/ml, mean PSAD values in positive and negative biopsy groups showed a significant difference while mean PSA values between these biopsy groups revealed no significant difference. The PSAD cutoff of more than 0.1 had higher sensitivity than 0.15 at the expense of increasing the number of unnecessary biopsies. Among those the patients with PSA levels above 10ng/ml, both mean PSA and PSAD values of positive and negative biopsy groups had significant differences. The sensitivity of PSAD cutoff of 0.1 was not significantly higher than 0.15 while PSAD of 0.15 showed a higher specificity. PSAD > 0.15 missed cancer in 18 out of 102 patients, nearly half of those with clinically significant mid and high grade cancers. Conclusion: Overall, PSAD is a better diagnostic tool for the detection of prostate cancer than PSA, especially in patients with PSA between 4 and 10ng/ml. PSAD cutoff of 0.15 is not inclusive enough in patients with PSA levels between 4 and 10ng/ml and we propose PSAD of 0.1 as a better threshold for prostate biopsy in men with PSA at this range to detect clinically important cancers. Also, we recommend transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy in any patient with PSAD greater than 0.15 and PSA more than 4 ng/ml.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 175
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Racial differences in prostate-specific antigen levels and prostate-specific antigen densities in patients with prostate cancer [J].
Abdalla, I ;
Ray, P ;
Ray, V ;
Vaida, F ;
Vijayakumar, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1999, 22 (06) :537-541
[2]   PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN DENSITY AND SYSTEMATIC BIOPSIES FOR EARLY DETECTION OF PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA [J].
BAZINET, M ;
MESHREF, AW ;
TRUDEL, C ;
ARONSON, S ;
PELOQUIN, F ;
NACHABE, M ;
BEGIN, LR ;
ELHILALI, MM .
UROLOGY, 1994, 43 (01) :44-51
[3]   THE USE OF PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN DENSITY TO ENHANCE THE PREDICTIVE VALUE OF INTERMEDIATE LEVELS OF SERUM PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN [J].
BENSON, MC ;
WHANG, IS ;
OLSSON, CA ;
MCMAHON, DJ ;
COONER, WH .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 147 (03) :817-821
[4]   THE INABILITY OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN INDEX TO ENHANCE THE PREDICTIVE VALUE OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA [J].
BRAWER, MK ;
ARAMBURU, EAG ;
CHEN, GL ;
PRESTON, SD ;
ELLIS, WJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 150 (02) :369-373
[5]   COMPARISON OF DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION AND SERUM PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN THE EARLY DETECTION OF PROSTATE-CANCER - RESULTS OF A MULTICENTER CLINICAL-TRIAL OF 6,630 MEN [J].
CATALONA, WJ ;
RICHIE, JP ;
AHMANN, FR ;
HUDSON, MA ;
SCARDINO, PT ;
FLANIGAN, RC ;
DEKERNION, JB ;
RATLIFF, TL ;
KAVOUSSI, LR ;
DALKIN, BL ;
WATERS, WB ;
MACFARLANE, MT ;
SOUTHWICK, PC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 151 (05) :1283-1290
[6]   COMPARISON OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN CONCENTRATION VERSUS PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN DENSITY IN THE EARLY DETECTION OF PROSTATE-CANCER - RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES [J].
CATALONA, WJ ;
RICHIE, JP ;
DEKERNION, JB ;
AHMANN, FR ;
RATLIFF, TL ;
DALKIN, BL ;
KAVOUSSI, LR ;
MACFARLANE, MT ;
SOUTHWICK, PC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 152 (06) :2031-2036
[7]   THE LACK OF PREDICTIVE VALUE OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN DENSITY IN THE DETECTION OF PROSTATE-CANCER IN PATIENTS WITH NORMAL RECTAL EXAMINATIONS AND INTERMEDIATE PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN LEVELS [J].
COOKSON, MS ;
FLOYD, MK ;
BALL, TP ;
MILLER, EK ;
SAROSDY, MF .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (03) :1070-1073
[8]  
Gregorio Emerson P., 2007, Int. braz j urol., V33, P151, DOI 10.1590/S1677-55382007000200004
[9]   Population-based screening for prostate cancer by measuring total serum prostate-specific antigen in Iran [J].
Hosseini, Seyyed Yousof ;
Moharramzadeh, Massood ;
Ghadian, Ali Reza ;
Hooshyar, Hassan ;
Lashay, Ali Reza ;
Safarinejad, Mohammah Reza .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 14 (05) :406-411
[10]  
LITTRUP PJ, 1995, CANCER, V755, P1805, DOI DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19950401)75:7+<1805::AID-CNCR28207516093.0.CO