Utility of FDG-PET in clinical neuroendocrine prostate cancer

被引:53
|
作者
Spratt, Daniel E. [1 ]
Gavane, Somali [2 ]
Tarlinton, Lisa [2 ]
Fareedy, Shoaib B. [2 ]
Doran, Michael G. [2 ]
Zelefsky, Michael J. [1 ]
Osborne, Joseph R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10065 USA
关键词
neuroendocrine; prostate cancer; PET; FDG; SMALL-CELL-CARCINOMA; ANDROGEN ABLATION; DIFFERENTIATION; IDENTIFICATION; ADENOCARCINOMA; ONCOLOGY;
D O I
10.1002/pros.22831
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) has well-characterized limitations in prostate adenocarcinoma (PCA). However, data assessing the utility of PET in neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) is limited to isolated case reports. Herein, we describe the first case series to assess the utility of FDG-PET in NEPC. METHODS Inclusion criteria consisted of clinically progressive metastatic PCA in the setting of a chromogranin-A levels >1.5x the upper limit of normal, and 1 FDG-PET scan after the diagnosis of NEPC, which yielded 23 patients. All metastatic lesions on CT, PET, and bone scan were read by two independent physicians. RESULTS Five hundred ninety two unique lesions were identified across all imaging modalities, 510 were bone metastases, and 82 were soft tissue metastases. Of bone lesions, 22.2%, 92.7%, and 77.6% were detected by PET, CT, and bone scan, respectively. Of soft tissue lesions, 95.1% and 97.5% were detected by PET and CT, respectively. Stratified by the median survival from NEPC diagnosis, patients who survived <2.2 versus 2.2 years had more PET avid bone (8 vs. 2, P=0.06) and soft tissue lesions (7 vs. 1, P=0.01), and higher average SUVmax of bone (5.49 vs. 3.40, P=0.04) and soft tissue lesions (8.02 vs. 3.90, P=0.0002). CONCLUSIONS In patients with clinical NEPC, we demonstrate that FDG-PET has clinical utility in the detection of metastatic disease. In addition to detection, PET allows for treatment response to determine tumor viability. With novel therapies on the horizon to treat NEPC, consideration to investigate the use of FDG-PET to monitor response is warranted. Prostate 74:1153-1159, 2014. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1153 / 1159
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Neuroendocrine cells of prostate cancer: biologic functions and molecular mechanisms
    Huang, Yu-Hua
    Zhang, Ya-Qun
    Huang, Jiao-Ti
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2019, 21 (03) : 291 - 295
  • [32] Narrative review of challenges in the management of advanced neuroendocrine prostate cancer
    Okasho, Kosuke
    Ogawa, Osamu
    Akamatsu, Shusuke
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2021, 10 (10) : 3953 - 3962
  • [33] FDG-PET in oncology: techniques and applications
    Kletter, K
    Becherer, A
    RADIOLOGE, 1999, 39 (07): : 600 - 609
  • [34] FDG-PET imaging in hematological malignancies
    Valls, L.
    Badve, C.
    Avril, S.
    Herrmann, K.
    Faulhaber, P.
    O'Donnell, J.
    Avril, N.
    BLOOD REVIEWS, 2016, 30 (04) : 317 - 331
  • [35] FDG-PET improves the staging and selection of patients with recurrent colorectal cancer
    Lonneux, M
    Reffad, AM
    Detry, R
    Kartheuser, A
    Gigot, JF
    Pauwels, S
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2002, 29 (07) : 915 - 921
  • [36] FDG-PET and pelvic gynecological cancers
    Gauthier, Helene
    Carpentier, Philippe
    Taieb, Sophie
    Narducci, Fabrice
    Leblanc, Eric
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2007, 17 (02) : 78 - 84
  • [37] FDG-PET and PET/CT in the clinical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor
    Basu, Sandip
    Mohandas, Kunissery Mallath
    Peshwe, Harish
    Asopa, Ramesh
    Vyawahare, Manoj
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2008, 29 (12) : 1026 - 1039
  • [38] Neuroendocrine prostate cancer
    Tritschler, S.
    Erdelkamp, R.
    Stief, C.
    Hentrich, M.
    PATHOLOGE, 2018, 39 (04): : 333 - 341
  • [39] Neuroendocrine prostate cancer
    Tritschler, S.
    Erdelkamp, R.
    Stief, C.
    Hentrich, M.
    UROLOGE, 2017, 56 (11): : 1475 - 1483
  • [40] FDG PET in suspected recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer
    Jadvar, H
    Pinski, JK
    Conti, PS
    ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2003, 10 (05) : 1485 - 1488