Utility of FDG-PET in clinical neuroendocrine prostate cancer

被引:53
|
作者
Spratt, Daniel E. [1 ]
Gavane, Somali [2 ]
Tarlinton, Lisa [2 ]
Fareedy, Shoaib B. [2 ]
Doran, Michael G. [2 ]
Zelefsky, Michael J. [1 ]
Osborne, Joseph R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10065 USA
关键词
neuroendocrine; prostate cancer; PET; FDG; SMALL-CELL-CARCINOMA; ANDROGEN ABLATION; DIFFERENTIATION; IDENTIFICATION; ADENOCARCINOMA; ONCOLOGY;
D O I
10.1002/pros.22831
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) has well-characterized limitations in prostate adenocarcinoma (PCA). However, data assessing the utility of PET in neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) is limited to isolated case reports. Herein, we describe the first case series to assess the utility of FDG-PET in NEPC. METHODS Inclusion criteria consisted of clinically progressive metastatic PCA in the setting of a chromogranin-A levels >1.5x the upper limit of normal, and 1 FDG-PET scan after the diagnosis of NEPC, which yielded 23 patients. All metastatic lesions on CT, PET, and bone scan were read by two independent physicians. RESULTS Five hundred ninety two unique lesions were identified across all imaging modalities, 510 were bone metastases, and 82 were soft tissue metastases. Of bone lesions, 22.2%, 92.7%, and 77.6% were detected by PET, CT, and bone scan, respectively. Of soft tissue lesions, 95.1% and 97.5% were detected by PET and CT, respectively. Stratified by the median survival from NEPC diagnosis, patients who survived <2.2 versus 2.2 years had more PET avid bone (8 vs. 2, P=0.06) and soft tissue lesions (7 vs. 1, P=0.01), and higher average SUVmax of bone (5.49 vs. 3.40, P=0.04) and soft tissue lesions (8.02 vs. 3.90, P=0.0002). CONCLUSIONS In patients with clinical NEPC, we demonstrate that FDG-PET has clinical utility in the detection of metastatic disease. In addition to detection, PET allows for treatment response to determine tumor viability. With novel therapies on the horizon to treat NEPC, consideration to investigate the use of FDG-PET to monitor response is warranted. Prostate 74:1153-1159, 2014. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1153 / 1159
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] FDG-PET Versus PSMA-PET: A Patient With Prostate Cancer
    Kichloo, Asim
    Amir, Rawan
    Aljadah, Michael
    Wani, Farah
    Solanki, Shantanu
    Singh, Jagmeet
    Chugh, Savneek Singh
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE HIGH IMPACT CASE REPORTS, 2020, 8
  • [2] Clinical Utility of FDG-PET and PET/CT in Non-malignant Thoracic Disorders
    Basu, Sandip
    Saboury, Babak
    Werner, Tom
    Alavi, Abass
    MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 13 (06) : 1051 - 1060
  • [3] FDG-PET and endometrial cancer
    Kolesnikov-Gauthier, Helene
    Carpentier, Philippe
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2012, 99 (01) : 21 - 28
  • [4] Clinical applications of FDG-PET in oncology
    Czernin, J
    ACTA MEDICA AUSTRIACA, 2002, 29 (05) : 162 - 170
  • [5] CLINICAL IMPACT OF FDG-PET IN PATIENTS WITH SUSPECTED RECURRENT OVARIAN CANCER
    Cuenca Cuenca, J. I.
    Borrego Dorado, I.
    Vazquez Albertino, R.
    Gomez Camarero, P.
    Sanz Viedma, S.
    Fernandez Lopez, R.
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE MEDICINA NUCLEAR, 2008, 27 (06): : 411 - 417
  • [6] FDG PET in Prostate Cancer
    Jadvar, Hossein
    PET CLINICS, 2009, 4 (02) : 155 - +
  • [7] FDG-PET and PET/CT in Colorectal Cancer
    Lonneux, Max
    PET CLINICS, 2008, 3 (02) : 147 - +
  • [8] Neuroendocrine prostate cancer
    Kretschmer, A.
    Wittekind, C.
    Stief, C. G.
    Gratzke, C.
    UROLOGE, 2015, 54 (12): : 1779 - 1783
  • [9] Neuroendocrine prostate cancer
    Kretschmer, A.
    Wittekind, C.
    Stief, C. G.
    Gratzke, C.
    UROLOGE, 2015, 54 (12): : 1779 - 1783
  • [10] Utility of Amyloid and FDG-PET in Clinical Practice: Differences Between Secondary and Tertiary Care Memory Units
    Lage, Carmen
    Gonzalez Suarez, Andrea
    Pozueta, Ana
    Riancho, Javier
    Kazimierczak, Martha
    Bravo, Maria
    Jimenez Bonilla, Julio
    de Arcocha Torres, Maria
    Quirce, Remedios
    Banzo, Ignacio
    Luis Vazquez-Higuera, Jose
    Rabinovici, Gil D.
    Rodriguez-Rodriguez, Eloy
    Sanchez-Juan, Pascual
    JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2018, 63 (03) : 1025 - 1033