Laparoscopic and Open Abdominal Staging for Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer Our Experience, Systematic Review, and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies

被引:53
|
作者
Bogani, Giorgio [1 ]
Cromi, Antonella [1 ]
Serati, Maurizio [1 ]
Di Naro, Edoardo [2 ]
Casarin, Jvan [1 ]
Pinelli, Ciro [1 ]
Ghezzi, Fabio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Insubria, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Del Ponte Hosp, Varese, Italy
[2] Univ Bari, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bari, Italy
关键词
Ovarian cancer; Laparoscopy; Open surgery; Long-term outcomes; Survival; FALLOPIAN-TUBE; I OVARIAN; MANAGEMENT; LAPAROTOMY; SURVIVAL; FEASIBILITY; EFFICACY; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1097/IGC.0000000000000214
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze perioperative and long-term survival outcomes after either laparoscopic or open abdominal staging for apparent early-stage ovarian cancer. Methods: Data of consecutive women with early-stage ovarian cancer undergoing comprehensive laparoscopic staging between 2003 and 2010 were matched with a historical cohort of patients undergoing open surgery. Five-year survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. In addition, a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of comparative studies was performed Results: A total of 35 women undergoing staging via laparoscopy were compared with a cohort of 32 patients undergoing open surgery. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Spillage occurred in 6 and 4 patients in laparoscopic and open group, respectively (P = 0.59). Patients undergoing laparoscopy experienced longer operative time (P < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (P = 0.03), and lower postoperative complication rate (3% vs 28%; P = 0.005) than patients undergoing staging via open surgery. The median (range) follow-up period was 64 (37-106) and 100 (61-278) months for case and control, respectively (P < 0.001). Five-year disease-free survival (P = 0.12, log-rank test) and overall survival (P = 0.26, log-rank test) were not influenced by surgical approach. Pooled analyses of the literature results corroborate our results suggesting an improvement of perioperative results in the laparoscopic group in comparison with the open abdominal one. In comparison with open surgery, laparoscopy did not influenced spillage (odds ratio [OR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-1.73) and upstaging rate (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.38-1.27). No between-group differences in survival were observed (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.21-1.21). Conclusions: Laparoscopy upholds open surgery in long-term oncologic control, reducing morbidity.
引用
收藏
页码:1241 / 1249
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Systematic review of laparoscopic comprehensive staging surgery in early stage ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis
    Lu, Yan
    Yao, De-sheng
    Xu, Jie-Hua
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 54 (01): : 29 - 38
  • [2] Minimally Invasive Surgical Staging in Early-stage Ovarian Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Bogani, Giorgio
    Borghi, Chiara
    Maggiore, Umberto Leone Roberti
    Ditto, Antonino
    Signorelli, Mauro
    Martinelli, Fabio
    Chiappa, Valentina
    Lopez, Carlos
    Sabatucci, Ilaria
    Scaffa, Cono
    Indini, Alice
    Ferrero, Simone
    Lorusso, Domenica
    Raspagliesi, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 24 (04) : 552 - 562
  • [3] Minimally Invasive Staging of Early-Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer versus Open Surgery in Terms of Feasibility and Safety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ronsini, Carlo
    Pasanisi, Francesca
    Molitierno, Rossella
    Iavarone, Irene
    Vastarella, Maria Giovanna
    De Franciscis, Pasquale
    Conte, Carmine
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (11)
  • [4] Impact of Lymphadenectomy on Outcomes of Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yao, Guorong
    Jin, Xiaotian
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2021, 8
  • [5] Sentinel lymph node detection in early-stage ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Agusti, Nuria
    Viveros-Carreno, David
    Grillo-Ardila, Carlos
    Izquierdo, Nora
    Paredes, Pilar
    Vidal-Sicart, Sergi
    Torne, Aureli
    Diaz-Feijoo, Berta
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2023, 33 (10) : 1493 - 1501
  • [6] Survival Impact of Ovarian Preservation on Women With Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Gu, Haifeng
    Li, Jundong
    Gu, Yangkui
    Tu, Hua
    Zhou, Yun
    Liu, Jihong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2017, 27 (01) : 77 - 84
  • [7] The attributive value of comprehensive surgical staging in clinically early-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    van de Vorst, Renee E. W. M.
    Hoogendam, Jacob P.
    van der Aa, Maaike A.
    Witteveen, Petronella O.
    Zweemer, Ronald P.
    Gerestein, Cornelis G.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 161 (03) : 876 - 883
  • [8] THE ATTRIBUTIVE VALUE OF COMPREHENSIVE SURGICAL STAGING IN CLINICALLY EARLY-STAGE EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CARCINOMA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Van de Vorst, R.
    Hoogendam, J.
    Van der Aa, M.
    Witteveen, P.
    Gerestein, C.
    Zweemer, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2021, 31 : A97 - A97
  • [9] Systematic lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis
    Wang, Lili
    Wu, Huanwen
    Wang, Li
    Zhang, Hui
    Lu, Junliang
    Liang, Zhiyong
    Liu, Tonghua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 9 (10): : 10788 - 10795
  • [10] Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies
    Tang, Kun
    Li, Heng
    Xia, Ding
    Hu, Zhiquan
    Zhuang, Qianyuan
    Liu, Jihong
    Xu, Hua
    Ye, Zhangqun
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (05):