Total disc replacement compared to lumbar fusion: a randomised controlled trial with 2-year follow-up

被引:104
作者
Berg, Svante [1 ]
Tullberg, Tycho [1 ]
Branth, Bjoern [1 ]
Olerud, Claes [1 ]
Tropp, Hans [2 ]
机构
[1] Lowenstromska Hosp, Stockholm Spine Ctr, S-19489 Upplands Vasby, Sweden
[2] Linkoping Univ Hosp, S-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
Degenerative disc disease; Prospective randomised controlled trial; Total disc replacement; Spinal fusion; Patients global assessment of back pain; LOW-BACK-PAIN; INVESTIGATIONAL DEVICE EXEMPTION; ARTIFICIAL DISC; MULTICENTER; CHARITE; ARTHROPLASTY; PRODISC; SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-009-1047-0
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The study design includes a prospective, randomised controlled study comparing total disc replacement (TDR) with posterior fusion. The main objective of this study is to compare TDR with lumbar spinal fusion, in terms of clinical outcome, in patients referred to a spine clinic for surgical evaluation. Fusion is effective for treating chronic low back pain (LBP), but has drawbacks, such as stiffness and possibly adjacent level degradation. Motion-preserving options have emerged, of which TDR is frequently used because of these drawbacks. How the results of TDR compare to fusion, however, is uncertain. One hundred and fifty-two patients with a mean age of 40 years (21-55) were included: 90 were women, and 80 underwent TDR. The patients had not responded to a conservative treatment programme and suffered from predominantly LBP, with varying degrees of leg pain. Diagnosis was based on clinical examination, radiographs, MRI, and in unclear cases, diagnostic injections. Outcome measures were global assessment (GA), VAS for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, SF36 and EQ5D at 1 and 2 years. Follow-up rate was 100%, at both 1 and 2 years. All outcome variables improved in both groups between preoperative and follow-up assessment. The primary outcome measure, GA, revealed that 30% in the TDR group and 15% in the fusion group were totally pain-free at 2 years (P = 0.031). TDR patients had reached maximum recovery in virtually all variables at 1 year, with significant differences compared to the fusion group. The fusion patients continued to improve and at 2 years had results similar to TDR patients apart from numbers of pain-free. Complications and reoperations were similar in both groups, but pedicle screw removal as additive surgery, was frequent in the fusion group. One year after surgery, TDR was superior to spinal fusion in clinical outcome, but this difference had diminished by 2 years, apart from (VAS for back pain and) numbers of pain-free. The long-term benefits have yet to be examined.
引用
收藏
页码:1512 / 1519
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   The positive effect of posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion is preserved at long-term follow-up:: a RCT with 11-13 year follow-up [J].
Andersen, Thomas ;
Videbaek, Tina S. ;
Hansen, Ebbe S. ;
Bunger, Cody ;
Christensen, Finn B. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 17 (02) :272-280
[2]  
Bertagnoli R, 2005, SPINE, V30, P2192, DOI 10.1097/01.brs.0000181061.43194.18
[3]   Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications [J].
Bertagnoli, R ;
Kumar, S .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2002, 11 (Suppl 2) :S131-S136
[4]   A prospective, randomized, multicenter food and drug administration Investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE™ artificial disc versus lumbar fusion Part I:: Evaluation of clinical outcomes [J].
Blumenthal, S ;
McAfee, PC ;
Guyer, RD ;
Hochschuler, SH ;
Geisler, FH ;
Holt, RT ;
Garcia, R ;
Regan, JJ ;
Ohnmeiss, DD .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (14) :1565-1575
[5]  
Bono Christopher M, 2004, Spine J, V4, p145S, DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.005
[6]   Effect of multilevel lumbar disc arthroplasty on the operative- and adjacent-level kinematics and intradiscal pressures: an in vitro human cadaveric assessment [J].
Dmitriev, Anton E. ;
Gill, Norman W. ;
Kuklo, Timothy R. ;
Rosner, Michael K. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (06) :918-925
[7]   Total disc replacement in the lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature [J].
Freeman, Brian J. C. ;
Davenport, James .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2006, 15 :S439-S447
[8]   2001 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies:: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain -: A multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group [J].
Fritzell, P ;
Hägg, O ;
Wessberg, P ;
Nordwall, A .
SPINE, 2001, 26 (23) :2521-2532
[9]   Complications in lumbar fusion surgery for chronic low back pain:: comparison of three surgical techniques used in a prospective randomized study.: A report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group [J].
Fritzell, P ;
Hägg, O ;
Nordwall, A .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2003, 12 (02) :178-189
[10]   Neurological complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical results with those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized investigational device exemption study of Charite intervertebral disc [J].
Geisler, FH ;
Blumenthal, SL ;
Guyer, RD ;
McAfee, PC ;
Regan, JJ ;
Johnson, JP ;
Mullin, B .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2004, 1 (02) :143-154