Narcolepsy type 1: what have we learned from immunology?

被引:21
|
作者
Kornum, Birgitte R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Neurosci, Panum Inst 24-6-14,Noerre Alle 20, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
关键词
narcolepsy; hypocretin; orexin; pathogenesis; autoimmune; T cells; TRIB2; AUTOANTIBODIES; MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS; RECENT-ONSET; HYPOCRETIN; ANTIBODIES; NEURONS; PATIENT; MUTATION; ABSENCE;
D O I
10.1093/sleep/zsaa055
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Narcolepsy type 1 is hypothesized to be an autoimmune disease targeting the hypocretin/orexin neurons in the hypothalamus. Ample genetic and epidemiological evidence points in the direction of a pathogenesis involving the immune system, but this is not considered proof of autoimmunity. In fact, it remains a matter of debate how to prove that a given disease is indeed an autoimmune disease. In this review, a set of commonly used criteria for autoimmunity is described and applied to narcolepsy type 1. In favor of the autoimmune hypothesis are data showing that in narcolepsy type 1 a specific adaptive immune response is directed to hypocretin/orexin neurons. Autoreactive T cells and autoantibodies have been detected in blood samples from patients, but it remains to be seen if these T cells or antibodies are in fact present in the hypothalamus. It is also unclear if the autoreactive T cells and/or autoantibodies can transfer the disease to healthy individuals or animals or if immunization with the proposed autoantigens can induce the disease in animal models. Most importantly, it is still controversial whether suppression of the autoimmune response can prevent disease progression. In conclusion, narcolepsy type 1 does still not fully meet the criteria for being classified as a genuine autoimmune disease, but more and more results are pointing in that direction.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] What have we learned?
    Winterbottom, Mark
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL EDUCATION, 2021, 55 (02) : 107 - 108
  • [42] WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED
    RAVDIN, IS
    MILITARY MEDICINE, 1963, 128 (01) : 56 - &
  • [43] Enterprise Modeling - What We Have Learned, and What We Have Not
    Jorgensen, Havard D.
    PRACTICE OF ENTERPRISE MODELING, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 39 : 3 - 7
  • [44] What have we learned from ESPRIT? What will we learn from TARGET?
    Ferguson, JJ
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 12 (06): : 317 - 319
  • [45] The beta-cell in type 1 diabetes: What have we learned from proteomic studies?
    Crevecoeur, Inne
    Rondas, Dieter
    Mathieu, Chantal
    Overbergh, Lut
    PROTEOMICS CLINICAL APPLICATIONS, 2015, 9 (7-8) : 755 - 766
  • [46] What have we really learned from SARS?
    Chin, M
    Yang, H
    Po, J
    Wynands, E
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2006, 53 (02): : 113 - 116
  • [47] Hemicentins: What have we learned from worms?
    Vogel, Bruce E.
    Muriel, Joaquin M.
    Dong, Chun
    Xu, Xuehong
    CELL RESEARCH, 2006, 16 (11) : 872 - 878
  • [48] What have we learned from market design?
    Roth, Alvin E.
    ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2008, 118 (527): : 285 - 310
  • [49] What have we learned from the Smart Machine?
    Burton-Jones, Andrew
    INFORMATION AND ORGANIZATION, 2014, 24 (02) : 71 - 105
  • [50] What have we learned from observational cosmology?
    Hamilton, J. -Ch.
    STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2014, 46 : 70 - 85