Narcolepsy type 1: what have we learned from immunology?

被引:21
|
作者
Kornum, Birgitte R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Neurosci, Panum Inst 24-6-14,Noerre Alle 20, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
关键词
narcolepsy; hypocretin; orexin; pathogenesis; autoimmune; T cells; TRIB2; AUTOANTIBODIES; MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS; RECENT-ONSET; HYPOCRETIN; ANTIBODIES; NEURONS; PATIENT; MUTATION; ABSENCE;
D O I
10.1093/sleep/zsaa055
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Narcolepsy type 1 is hypothesized to be an autoimmune disease targeting the hypocretin/orexin neurons in the hypothalamus. Ample genetic and epidemiological evidence points in the direction of a pathogenesis involving the immune system, but this is not considered proof of autoimmunity. In fact, it remains a matter of debate how to prove that a given disease is indeed an autoimmune disease. In this review, a set of commonly used criteria for autoimmunity is described and applied to narcolepsy type 1. In favor of the autoimmune hypothesis are data showing that in narcolepsy type 1 a specific adaptive immune response is directed to hypocretin/orexin neurons. Autoreactive T cells and autoantibodies have been detected in blood samples from patients, but it remains to be seen if these T cells or antibodies are in fact present in the hypothalamus. It is also unclear if the autoreactive T cells and/or autoantibodies can transfer the disease to healthy individuals or animals or if immunization with the proposed autoantigens can induce the disease in animal models. Most importantly, it is still controversial whether suppression of the autoimmune response can prevent disease progression. In conclusion, narcolepsy type 1 does still not fully meet the criteria for being classified as a genuine autoimmune disease, but more and more results are pointing in that direction.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] What we have learned from Fukushima
    Tamaki, Nagara
    Shishido, Fumio
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2011, 38 (09) : 1589 - 1590
  • [22] What have we learned from OpenReview?
    Gang Wang
    Qi Peng
    Yanfeng Zhang
    Mingyang Zhang
    World Wide Web, 2023, 26 : 683 - 708
  • [23] What we have learned from Fukushima
    Nagara Tamaki
    Fumio Shishido
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2011, 38 : 1589 - 1590
  • [24] What Have We Learned from OpenReview?
    Wang, Gang
    Peng, Qi
    Zhang, Yanfeng
    Zhang, Mingyang
    WEB AND BIG DATA, APWEB-WAIM 2021, PT I, 2021, 12858 : 63 - 79
  • [25] WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED FROM DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION
    BACHRACH, LL
    LAMB, HR
    PSYCHIATRIC ANNALS, 1989, 19 (01) : 12 - +
  • [26] WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED FROM METAANALYSIS
    STOCKLER, M
    COATES, A
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1993, 159 (05) : 291 - 293
  • [27] WHAT WE HAVE LEARNED FROM PHALLOIDIN
    FRIMMER, M
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 1987, 35 (2-3) : 169 - 182
  • [28] WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED FROM LSD
    BERCEL, A
    ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1962, 6 (01) : 71 - &
  • [29] What Have We Learned from CONTRAST?
    Mostovaya, Ira M.
    Blankestijn, Peter J.
    BLOOD PURIFICATION, 2013, 35 : 39 - 44
  • [30] From JNC 1 to JNC 7 - What have we learned?
    Moser, M
    PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2006, 48 (05) : 303 - 315