Systematic review and meta-analysis of rectal washout on risk of local recurrence for cancer

被引:26
作者
Zhou, Can [1 ,2 ]
Ren, Yu [2 ]
Li, Juan [1 ]
Li, Xiao [2 ]
He, Jianjun [2 ]
Liu, Peijun [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Translat Med Ctr, Xian 710061, Shaanxi Provinc, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Sch Med, Dept Surg Oncol, Xian 710061, Shaanxi Provinc, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Meta-analysis; Rectal cancer; Normal saline; Irrigation volume; Local recurrence; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; ANTERIOR RESECTION; IMPLANTATION METASTASIS; SURVIVAL; CELLS; PERFORATION; VALIDATION; CARCINOMA; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2014.01.030
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: It has been shown that intraluminal washout (WO) can prevent local recurrence (LR) of rectal cancer. This meta-analysis was to evaluate the association of rectal WO and the risk of LR after anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer. Methods: The relevant studies were identified by a search of the MEDLINE, Embase, Wiley Online Library, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Specialized Register with no restrictions on October 18, 2013, and these studies were included in a systematic review and meta-analysis. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated in fixed effects model. Results: A total of nine studies were included in our study, yielding a total of 5519 patients, and pooled ORs for overall LR in corresponding subgroups were calculated. Rectal WO was associated with a lower risk for LR (240/4176, 5.75% versus 9.75%, 131/1343, OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.42-0.68, and P < 0.00001) in patients with anterior resection, having total mesorectal excisions (234/3942, 5.93% versus 9.34%, 97/1039, OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.46-0.75, and P < 0.00001), and after radical resection (RR; 122/2665, 4.99% versus 8.90%, 74/831, OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.41-0.78, and P = 0.0005), with an overall LR rate of 6.72%(371/5519). But, the stability of RRs is not high in the total mesorectal excisions or RR subgroup by sensitivity analysis. Conclusions: The use of rectal WO decreases risks of LR in patients after anterior resection of cancer. Crown Copyright (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 16
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Does rectal washout during anterior resection prevent local tumor recurrence? [J].
Agaba, EA .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2004, 47 (03) :291-296
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, NIPPON DAICHO KOMONB
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, JUNTENDO IGAKU
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, NIPPON RINSHO GEKA G
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, SURGERY, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.SURG.2009.06.030
[6]   Local recurrence following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer [J].
Arbman, G ;
Nilsson, E ;
Hallbook, O ;
Sjodahl, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 83 (03) :375-379
[7]   Does rectal washout during anterior resection prevent local tumor recurrence? [J].
Byrne, CM ;
Perera, DS ;
King, DW .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (01) :172-173
[8]   Is rectal washout effective for preventing localized recurrence after anterior resection for rectal cancer? [J].
Constantinides, Vasilis A. ;
Cheetham, Dorstan ;
Nicholls, R. John ;
Tekkis, Paris P. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2008, 51 (09) :1339-1344
[9]   Clinical and pathologic predictors of locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, and overall survival in patients treated with chemoradiation and mesorectal excision for rectal cancer [J].
Das, P ;
Skibber, JM ;
Rodriguez-Bigas, MA ;
Feig, BW ;
Chang, GJ ;
Hoff, PM ;
Eng, C ;
Wolff, RA ;
JanJan, NA ;
Delclos, ME ;
Krishnan, S ;
Levy, LB ;
Ellis, LM ;
Crane, CH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2006, 29 (03) :219-224
[10]   Long-term results show triple stapling facilitates safe low colorectal and coloanal anastomosis and is associated with low rates of local recurrence after anterior resection for rectal cancer [J].
Edwards D.P. ;
Sexton R. ;
Heald R.J. ;
Moran B.J. .
Techniques in Coloproctology, 2007, 11 (1) :17-21