Evolving the ecosystem approach in European fisheries: Transferable lessons from New Zealand's experience in strengthening stakeholder involvement

被引:12
作者
Mackinson, S. [1 ]
Middleton, D. A. J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Scottish Pelag Fishermens Assoc, Heritage House,Shore St, Fraserburgh AB43 9BP, Scotland
[2] Trident Syst, POB 297, Wellington 6140, New Zealand
关键词
Stakeholder; Ecosystem approach; Co-management; Governance; Participatory research; Decision-making; COMANAGEMENT REGIME; ADVISORY COUNCILS; MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE; KNOWLEDGE; POLICY; EU;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2017.12.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Processes and behaviours from New Zealand's experience of industry stakeholders' participation in research and management could be transferrable to Europe, helping expedite its evolution to inclusive governance models consistent with an ecosystem approach to fisheries management. In particular, experience from NZ could help to alleviate bottlenecks arising from inadequate institutional governance apparatus and barriers to acquisition and application of relevant knowledge.. The short pathways, fewer people and simplicity of a unilateral decision making process make NZ a good place to learn about inclusive governance of fisheries. The detail of why, where and how industry stakeholders get involved in research and management is shaped by the legislative framework, the structures that support it, the people, and how they organise their involvement. Specific examples are used to illustrate four ways in which Europe could apply experience from NZ to enhance the inclusivity of industry stakeholders the evidence-management system required to implement the ecosystem approach to fisheries: (i) Defined 'rules' of engagement, (ii) MoU's to promote a shared vision and the planning to achieve it, (iii) Extended peer review process (iv) Inclusion of research knowledge from industry and science-industry partnerships.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 202
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, ICES STRATEGIC PLAN
[2]  
Ballesteros M., 2017, ICES J MAR SCI
[3]  
Bavinck M., 2015, INTERACTIVE FISHERIE, P72
[4]  
Connor R., 2010, HDB MARINE FISHERIES, P784
[5]   Decentralising: The implementation of regionalisation and co-management under the post-2013 Common Fisheries Policy [J].
Eliasen, Soren Q. ;
Hegland, Troels J. ;
Raakjaer, Jesper .
MARINE POLICY, 2015, 62 :224-232
[6]  
Griffin L., 2013, GOOD GOVERNANCE SCAL
[7]   Opportunities and barriers for industry-led fisheries research [J].
Harte, M .
MARINE POLICY, 2001, 25 (02) :159-167
[8]  
Harte M. J., 2008, CASE STUDIES FISHERI
[9]   From RACs to Advisory Councils: Lessons from North Sea discourse for the 2014 reform of the European Common Fisheries Policy [J].
Hatchard, Jenny L. ;
Gray, Tim S. .
MARINE POLICY, 2014, 47 :87-93
[10]  
Heron M., 2016, INDEPENDENT REV MPI